105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18796797)
1. A comparison of the passive support provided by various ankle braces.
Alves JW; Alday RV; Ketcham DL; Lentell G
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1992; 15(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 18796797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of ankle braces upon agility course performance in high school athletes.
Beriau MR; Cox WB; Manning J
J Athl Train; 1994 Sep; 29(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 16558284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the Sport Stirrup, Malleoloc, and Swede-O ankle orthoses for the foot-ankle kinematics of a rapid lateral movement.
Simpson KJ; Cravens S; Higbie E; Theodorou C; DelRey P
Int J Sports Med; 1999 Aug; 20(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 10496120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gait comparison of subjects with hemiplegia walking unbraced, with ankle-foot orthosis, and with Air-Stirrup brace.
Burdett RG; Borello-France D; Blatchly C; Potter C
Phys Ther; 1988 Aug; 68(8):1197-203. PubMed ID: 3399515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The three-dimensional passive support characteristics of ankle braces.
Siegler S; Liu W; Sennett B; Nobilini RJ; Dunbar D
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1997 Dec; 26(6):299-309. PubMed ID: 9402566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of semirigid Air-Stirrup bracing vs. adhesive ankle taping on motor performance.
Verbrugge JD
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1996 May; 23(5):320-5. PubMed ID: 8728530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of moleskin tape, linen tape, and lace-up brace on joint restriction and movement performance.
Metcalfe RC; Schlabach GA; Looney MA; Renehan EJ
J Athl Train; 1997 Apr; 32(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 16558443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Passive stability characteristics of ankle braces and tape in simulated barefoot and shoe conditions.
Eils E; Imberge S; Völker K; Rosenbaum D
Am J Sports Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):282-7. PubMed ID: 17092922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices.
Burks RT; Bean BG; Marcus R; Barker HB
Am J Sports Med; 1991; 19(2):104-6. PubMed ID: 2039059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of DonJoy ankle ligament protector and subtalar sling ankle taping in restricting foot and ankle motion before and after exercise.
Gross MT; Batten AM; Lamm AL; Lorren JL; Stevens JJ; Davis JM; Wilkerson GB
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1994 Jan; 19(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 8156062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ankle ranges of motion during extended activity periods while taped and braced.
Paris DL; Kokkaliaris J; Vardaxis V
J Athl Train; 1995 Sep; 30(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 16558340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of support provided by ankle taping and semirigid orthosis.
Gross MT; Bradshaw MK; Ventry LC; Weller KH
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1987; 9(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 18794591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Aircast brace and elastic bandage on physical performance of athletes after ankle injuries.
Günay S; Karaduman A; Oztürk BB
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2014; 48(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 24643094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of an ankle brace with a subtalar locking system in inversion control in dynamic movements.
Zhang S; Wortley M; Chen Q; Freedman J
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2009 Dec; 39(12):875-83. PubMed ID: 20026883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Leuko and Nessa Ankle braces: effectiveness before and after exercise.
Tweedy R; Carson T; Vicenzino B
Aust J Sci Med Sport; 1994; 26(3-4):62-6. PubMed ID: 8665279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative support evaluation of three ankle orthoses before, during, and after exercise.
Greene TA; Wight CR
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1990; 11(10):453-66. PubMed ID: 18796890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of ankle support on joint range of motion before and after exercise: a meta-analysis.
Cordova ML; Ingersoll CD; LeBlanc MJ
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2000 Apr; 30(4):170-7; discussion 178-82. PubMed ID: 10778794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.
Hume PA; Gerrard DF
Sports Med; 1998 May; 25(5):285-312. PubMed ID: 9629608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prophylactic ankle bracing reduces rearfoot motion during sudden inversion.
Cordova ML; Dorrough JL; Kious K; Ingersoll CD; Merrick MA
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2007 Jun; 17(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 16800843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of taping and bracing in balance.
Barkoukis V; Sykaras E; Costa F; Tsorbatzoudis H
Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Apr; 94(2):566-74. PubMed ID: 12027354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
