BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18796890)

  • 1. A comparative support evaluation of three ankle orthoses before, during, and after exercise.
    Greene TA; Wight CR
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1990; 11(10):453-66. PubMed ID: 18796890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of support provided by ankle taping and semirigid orthosis.
    Gross MT; Bradshaw MK; Ventry LC; Weller KH
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1987; 9(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 18794591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Donjoy Ankle Ligament Protector and Aircast Sport-Stirrup orthoses on functional performance.
    Gross MT; Everts JR; Roberson SE; Roskin DS; Young KD
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1994 Mar; 19(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 8156066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the passive support provided by various ankle braces.
    Alves JW; Alday RV; Ketcham DL; Lentell G
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1992; 15(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 18796797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of DonJoy ankle ligament protector and subtalar sling ankle taping in restricting foot and ankle motion before and after exercise.
    Gross MT; Batten AM; Lamm AL; Lorren JL; Stevens JJ; Davis JM; Wilkerson GB
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1994 Jan; 19(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 8156062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Isometric strength of rearfoot inversion and eversion in nonsupported, taped, and braced ankles assessed by a hand-held dynamometer.
    Paris DL; Sullivan SJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1992; 15(5):229-35. PubMed ID: 18796780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of moleskin tape, linen tape, and lace-up brace on joint restriction and movement performance.
    Metcalfe RC; Schlabach GA; Looney MA; Renehan EJ
    J Athl Train; 1997 Apr; 32(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 16558443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of ankle orthoses on functional performance for individuals with recurrent lateral ankle sprains.
    Gross MT; Clemence LM; Cox BD; McMillan HP; Meadows AF; Piland CS; Powers WS
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1997 Apr; 25(4):245-52. PubMed ID: 9083943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative isokinetic evaluation of a functional ankle orthosis on talocalcaneal function.
    Greene TA; Roland GC
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1989; 11(6):245-52. PubMed ID: 18796908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of support provided by a semirigid orthosis and adhesive ankle taping before, during, and after exercise.
    Greene TA; Hillman SK
    Am J Sports Med; 1990; 18(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 2252091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bilateral inversion-eversion range of motion comparisons among college athletes.
    Greene TA; Hillman SK
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1990; 11(11):543-6. PubMed ID: 18787267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of ankle support devices.
    Johnson RE; Veale JR; McCarthy GJ
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1994 Mar; 84(3):107-14. PubMed ID: 8040806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of balance training on post-sprained ankle joint instability.
    Faizullin I; Faizullina E
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S99-S101. PubMed ID: 26639734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of ankle braces upon agility course performance in high school athletes.
    Beriau MR; Cox WB; Manning J
    J Athl Train; 1994 Sep; 29(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 16558284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ankle ranges of motion during extended activity periods while taped and braced.
    Paris DL; Kokkaliaris J; Vardaxis V
    J Athl Train; 1995 Sep; 30(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 16558340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the Sport Stirrup, Malleoloc, and Swede-O ankle orthoses for the foot-ankle kinematics of a rapid lateral movement.
    Simpson KJ; Cravens S; Higbie E; Theodorou C; DelRey P
    Int J Sports Med; 1999 Aug; 20(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 10496120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of external prophylactic support in restricting accessory ankle motion after exercise.
    Miller H; Needle AR; Swanik CB; Gustavsen GA; Kaminski TW
    Foot Ankle Int; 2012 Oct; 33(10):862-9. PubMed ID: 23050711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ankle stabilizers affect agility but not vertical jump or dynamic balance performance.
    Ambegaonkar JP; Redmond CJ; Winter C; Cortes N; Ambegaonkar SJ; Thompson B; Guyer SM
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2011 Dec; 4(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 22184741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices.
    Burks RT; Bean BG; Marcus R; Barker HB
    Am J Sports Med; 1991; 19(2):104-6. PubMed ID: 2039059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of an ankle orthosis on ankle range of motion and performance.
    Wiley JP; Nigg BM
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1996 Jun; 23(6):362-9. PubMed ID: 8727016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.