258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18797091)
1. Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
Logani A; Shah N
Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 18797091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using four rotary instrumentation systems: an in vitro study.
Nagaveni SA; Balakoti KR; Smita K; Ratnakar P; Satish SV; Aravind T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1065-9. PubMed ID: 24858752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments.
Capar ID; Arslan H; Akcay M; Ertas H
J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1638-41. PubMed ID: 25260737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Influence of Cervical Preflaring on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris after Root Canal Preparation Using Different Instrumentation Systems.
Borges ÁH; Pereira TM; Porto AN; de Araújo Estrela CR; Miranda Pedro FL; Aranha AM; Guedes OA
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 26614016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
Topçuoğlu HS; Aktı A; Tuncay Ö; Dinçer AN; Düzgün S; Topçuoğlu G
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2066-9. PubMed ID: 25443282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles.
Altundasar E; Nagas E; Uyanik O; Serper A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):e31-5. PubMed ID: 21778084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems.
Küçükyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
Reddy SA; Hicks ML
J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria following use of Two Engine-driven Instrumentation Techniques: An in vitro Study.
Mohammed N; Noushad MC; Balan B; Dhanesh N; Jayasheelan N; Revankar VD
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):939-942. PubMed ID: 27965505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system.
De-Deus GA; Nogueira Leal Silva EJ; Moreira EJ; de Almeida Neves A; Belladonna FG; Tameirão M
J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 24666904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files.
Topçuoğlu G; Topçuoğlu HS; Akpek F
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 26(5):357-63. PubMed ID: 26538300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the effect of various irrigants on apically extruded debris after root canal preparation.
Parirokh M; Jalali S; Haghdoost AA; Abbott PV
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 22244635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apically-extruded debris using the ProTaper system.
Azar NG; Ebrahimi G
Aust Endod J; 2005 Apr; 31(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 15881729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of apically extruded debris associated with several Ni-Ti systems.
Üstün Y; Çanakçi BC; Dinçer AN; Er O; Düzgün S
Int Endod J; 2015 Jul; 48(7):701-4. PubMed ID: 25112960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ex vivo analysis of the debris remaining in flattened root canals of vital and nonvital teeth after biomechanical preparation with Ni-Ti rotary instruments.
Sasaki EW; Versiani MA; Perez DE; Sousa-Neto MD; Silva-Sousa YT; Silva RG
Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 17262131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of ProTaper Next and HyFlex instruments on apical debris extrusion in curved canals.
Koçak MM; Çiçek E; Koçak S; Sağlam BC; Furuncuoğlu F
Int Endod J; 2016 Oct; 49(10):996-1000. PubMed ID: 26383696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating In Vitro Performance of Novel Nickel-Titanium Rotary System (TruNatomy) Based on Debris Extrusion and Preparation Time from Severely Curved Canals.
Mustafa R; Al Omari T; Al-Nasrawi S; Al Fodeh R; Dkmak A; Haider J
J Endod; 2021 Jun; 47(6):976-981. PubMed ID: 33737004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems.
Koçak MM; Çiçek E; Koçak S; Sağlam BC; Yılmaz N
Int Endod J; 2015 Mar; 48(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 24863544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques.
Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Er K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 18230395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
