These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18797091)

  • 21. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reciprocating versus rotary systems for root filling removal: assessment of the apically extruded material.
    Silva EJ; Sá L; Belladonna FG; Neves AA; Accorsi-Mendonça T; Vieira VT; De-Deus G; Moreira EJ
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2077-80. PubMed ID: 25442728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Apical extrusion of debris using self-adjusting file, reciprocating single-file, and 2 rotary instrumentation systems.
    Koçak S; Koçak MM; Sağlam BC; Türker SA; Sağsen B; Er Ö
    J Endod; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1278-80. PubMed ID: 24041391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
    Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of conventional, protaper hand and protaper rotary instrumentation system for apical extrusion of debris, irrigants and bacteria- An
    Kalra P; Rao A; Suman E; Shenoy R; Suprabha BS
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Feb; 9(2):e254-e258. PubMed ID: 28210445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris and Irrigant Produced by Different Nickel-Titanium Instrument Systems in Primary Teeth.
    Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Nov; 16(11):864-8. PubMed ID: 26718292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris from Curved Root Canal Filling Removal Using 5 Nickel-Titanium Systems.
    Çanakçi BC; Ustun Y; Er O; Genc Sen O
    J Endod; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1101-4. PubMed ID: 27179592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems.
    Silva EJ; Carapiá MF; Lopes RM; Belladonna FG; Senna PM; Souza EM; De-Deus G
    Int Endod J; 2016 Jul; 49(7):700-5. PubMed ID: 26174577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of apically extruded debris and irrigant using different file systems.
    Kütük B; Akpınar KE; Altunbaş D
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1555-1560. PubMed ID: 29378986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with two different rotary systems followed by a self-adjusting file.
    Cakici F; Cakici EB; Küçükekenci FF
    Int J Artif Organs; 2016 Feb; 39(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 26953903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems.
    Kirchhoff AL; Fariniuk LF; Mello I
    J Endod; 2015 Feb; 41(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 25447504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 22595125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Ferraz CC; Gomes NV; Gomes BP; Zaia AA; Teixeira FB; Souza-Filho FJ
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jul; 34(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 11482718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Apical extrusion of debris using reciprocating files and rotary instrumentation systems.
    Uzun I; Güler B; Özyürek T; Tunc T
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 26755222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3 different rotary instrumentation systems.
    Tanalp J; Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Bayirl G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 16448929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O
    J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant with three rotary instruments using crown down technique - An in vitro study.
    Jindal R; Singh S; Gupta S; Jindal P
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2012; 2(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 25737844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.