146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18797652)
1. [Unpublished, originality, importance, publicity, interest, and impact of scientific articles].
Bicas HE
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(4):473-4. PubMed ID: 18797652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Writers' uncertainty in scientific and popular biomedical articles. A comparative analysis of the British Medical Journal and Discover Magazine.
Bongelli R; Riccioni I; Burro R; Zuczkowski A
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221933. PubMed ID: 31487308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact factor and other standardized measures of journal citation: a perspective.
Mathur VP; Sharma A
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 19336866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhancing the scientific and internationalization levels of the Circulation Journal.
Shimokawa H
Circ J; 2012; 76(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22130320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the journal impact factor a valid indicator of scientific value?
Oh HC; Lim JF
Singapore Med J; 2009 Aug; 50(8):749-51. PubMed ID: 19710968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The relevance of the psychiatric Latin American scientific production and suicidologie in the psychiatric journals with major impact factor].
Rocha FF; Carmo Wd; Castro V; Amaral D; Correa H
Braz J Psychiatry; 2008 Mar; 30(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 18373027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancing the quality of scientific research.
Braile DM
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc; 2013; 28(3):I-III. PubMed ID: 24343697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Toxins: State of the Journal Report, 2017.
Xiao C; Tesh VL
Toxins (Basel); 2017 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 28165400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metadiscourse markers in biological research articles and journal impact factor: Non-native writers vs. native writers.
Gholami J; Ilghami R
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2016 Jul; 44(4):349-60. PubMed ID: 26898954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The journal and 2011: a time for stocktaking.
Irwin RS; Augustyn N;
Chest; 2011 Jan; 139(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 21208870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Editorial Board Position statement regarding the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) recommendations with respect to journal impact factors.
Welk G; Fischman MG; Greenleaf C; Harrison L; Ransdell L; van der Mars H; Zhu W
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2014 Dec; 85(4):429-30. PubMed ID: 25412123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact, quality and inclusiveness in Australasian Journal on Ageing.
Parkinson L
Australas J Ageing; 2017 Mar; 36(1):8. PubMed ID: 28326687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ball and chain.
Nat Immunol; 2010 Oct; 11(10):873. PubMed ID: 20856213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response to 'How good is research really?'.
Rodríguez-Navarro A
EMBO Rep; 2013 Jun; 14(6):493. PubMed ID: 23670198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pearls for optimizing biomedical manuscripts.
Tabibian JH; Aguilar-Olivos NE; Méndez-Sánchez N
Ann Hepatol; 2015; 14(6):774-6. PubMed ID: 26436348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ongoing and new challenges of our journal.
von Eckardstein A; Negrini S
Atherosclerosis; 2018 Feb; 269():252-253. PubMed ID: 29439804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Facing a fast-changing world with "no change".
Zhu W
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2014 Dec; 85(4):427-8. PubMed ID: 25412122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of ophthalmology.
Duffel PG; Weingeist TA
Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1423-4. PubMed ID: 19651309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comments to the response of Rodríguez-Navarro.
Bornmann L; Marx W
EMBO Rep; 2013 Jun; 14(6):493-4. PubMed ID: 23670196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The art and science of scientific writing.
Mestres CA; Sampathkumar A
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2019 Jun; 27(5):335-337. PubMed ID: 31188675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
