146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18798512)
1. [Developing parameters for predicting macrosomia].
Liang JZ; Xiao B; Li H; Zhuang L
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Jul; 39(4):635-7. PubMed ID: 18798512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur.
Johnsen SL; Wilsgaard T; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):172-85. PubMed ID: 16289532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length.
Leung TN; Pang MW; Daljit SS; Leung TY; Poon CF; Wong SM; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18241086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of fetal macrosomia by single ultrasonic fetal biometry.
Chen CP; Chang FM; Chang CH; Lin YS; Chou CY; Ko HC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 Jan; 92(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 8099822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal biacromial diameter as a new ultrasound measure for prediction of macrosomia in term pregnancy: a prospective observational study.
Youssef AEA; Amin AF; Khalaf M; Khalaf MS; Ali MK; Abbas AM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(16):2674-2679. PubMed ID: 29478363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term.
Kayem G; Grangé G; Bréart G; Goffinet F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 19582801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Ultrasonic measurements of fetal thigh soft tissue thickness in the estimation of fetal weight].
Han Y; Lin H; Liu Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 May; 33(5):277-9. PubMed ID: 10682438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prenatal diagnose of abnormalities of fetal limb bone].
Song J; Wang X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 45(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 21176554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic estimate of birth weight: relative accuracy of sonographers versus maternal-fetal medicine specialists.
Humphries J; Reynolds D; Bell-Scarbrough L; Lynn N; Scardo JA; Chauhan SP
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Feb; 11(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 12375539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of fetal and parental factors on intrauterine growth measurements: results of the EDEN mother-child cohort.
Albouy-Llaty M; Thiebaugeorges O; Goua V; Magnin G; Schweitzer M; Forhan A; Lelong N; Slama R; Charles MA; Kaminski M;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 21438052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal age assessment based on femur length at 10-25 weeks of gestation, and reference ranges for femur length to head circumference ratios.
Johnsen SL; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):725-33. PubMed ID: 16026396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasonographic monitoring of fetal development in unrestrained bonobos (Pan paniscus) at the Milwaukee County Zoo.
Drews B; Harmann LM; Beehler LL; Bell B; Drews RF; Hildebrandt TB
Zoo Biol; 2011; 30(3):241-53. PubMed ID: 20073051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Sonographic estimation of fetal weight at term: a proposal of a predictive score of a weight more than 4500 g].
Kraiem J; Chiha N; Bouden S; Ounaissa F; Falfoul A
Tunis Med; 2004 Jun; 82(6):526-30. PubMed ID: 15517951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foetal biometry in polyhydramnios: Does femur length fall behind?
Ipek A; Idilman IS; Kurt A; Cay N; Unal O; Erdogan BD; Keskin HL; Arslan H
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016; 36(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 26467094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
