These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1879861)

  • 1. Perceived locus and intensity of electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Higashiyama A; Rollman GB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Jul; 38(7):679-86. PubMed ID: 1879861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrocutaneous code pairs for artificial sensory communication systems.
    Szeto AY
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1982; 10(4):175-92. PubMed ID: 7171152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Focal electrically administered therapy: device parameter effects on stimulus perception in humans.
    Borckardt JJ; Linder KJ; Ricci R; Li X; Anderson B; Arana A; Nahas Z; Amassian V; Long J; George MS; Sackeim HA
    J ECT; 2009 Jun; 25(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 19092677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrocutaneous spatial integration at threshold: the effects of electrode size.
    Higashiyama A; Tashiro T
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 2243763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When size matters: large electrodes induce greater stimulation-related cutaneous discomfort than smaller electrodes at equivalent current density.
    Turi Z; Ambrus GG; Ho KA; Sengupta T; Paulus W; Antal A
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 24582373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation.
    Jelinek HF; McIntyre R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distally-referred surface electrical nerve stimulation (DR-SENS) for haptic feedback.
    Mesias L; Gormez MA; Tyler DJ; Makowski NS; Graczyk EL; Fu MJ
    J Neural Eng; 2023 Dec; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 37863034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects.
    Fertonani A; Ferrari C; Miniussi C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Nov; 126(11):2181-8. PubMed ID: 25922128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
    Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A system for inducing concurrent tactile and nociceptive sensations at the same site using electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Steenbergen P; Buitenweg JR; Trojan J; van der Heide EM; van den Heuvel T; Flor H; Veltink PH
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):924-33. PubMed ID: 22806702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A finite element model to identify electrode influence on current distribution in the skin.
    Sha N; Kenney LP; Heller BW; Barker AT; Howard D; Moatamedi M
    Artif Organs; 2008 Aug; 32(8):639-43. PubMed ID: 18782136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing the sensation of electrical stimulation with dry electrodes by using an array of constant current sources.
    Solomons CD; Slovak M; Heller B; Barker AT
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 Jan; 51():91-95. PubMed ID: 29191409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The electrophysiology of de qi sensations.
    Leung AY; Park J; Schulteis G; Duann JR; Yaksh T
    J Altern Complement Med; 2006 Oct; 12(8):743-50. PubMed ID: 17034280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mitigating cutaneous sensation differences during tDCS: comparing sham versus low intensity control conditions.
    Brunyé TT; Cantelon J; Holmes A; Taylor HA; Mahoney CR
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(6):832-5. PubMed ID: 25444591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation produces variable changes in somatosensory evoked potentials, sensory perception and pain threshold: clinical implications for pain relief.
    Golding JF; Ashton H; Marsh R; Thompson JW
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1986 Dec; 49(12):1397-406. PubMed ID: 3492591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neurosensory effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation.
    Raco V; Bauer R; Olenik M; Brkic D; Gharabaghi A
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(6):823-31. PubMed ID: 25442154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The respiratory cycle modulates brain potentials, sympathetic activity, and subjective pain sensation induced by noxious stimulation.
    Iwabe T; Ozaki I; Hashizume A
    Neurosci Res; 2014 Jul; 84():47-59. PubMed ID: 24667456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mathematical model of make and break electrical stimulation of cardiac tissue by a unipolar anode or cathode.
    Roth BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Dec; 42(12):1174-84. PubMed ID: 8550059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrical stimulation and electrode properties. Part 2: pure metal electrodes.
    Stevenson M; Baylor K; Netherton BL; Stecker MM
    Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol; 2010 Dec; 50(4):263-96. PubMed ID: 21313789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characteristics of temporal summation of second pain sensations elicited by brief contact of glabrous skin by a preheated thermode.
    Vierck CJ; Cannon RL; Fry G; Maixner W; Whitsel BL
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Aug; 78(2):992-1002. PubMed ID: 9307129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.