473 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18798782)
41. Biomechanical behaviour of a fractured maxillary incisor restored with direct composite resin only or with different post systems.
Garbin CA; Spazzin AO; Meira-Júnior AD; Loretto SC; Lyra AM; Braz R
Int Endod J; 2010 Dec; 43(12):1098-107. PubMed ID: 20726914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. In vitro comparison of fracture strength of experimental hollow and solid design zirconia dowels.
Özkurt Z; Baybora Kayahan M; Kazazoğlu E
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 22469214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region.
Tsumita M; Kokubo Y; Vult von Steyern P; Fukushima S
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 18205740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Framework design of an anterior fiber-reinforced hybrid composite fixed partial denture: a 3D finite element study.
Yokoyama D; Shinya A; Lassila LV; Gomi H; Nakasone Y; Vallittu PK; Shinya A
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 19639081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Analysis of stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor subjected to various post and core applications.
Yaman SD; Alaçam T; Yaman Y
J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 9641141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A comparison of 2D and 3D finite element analysis of a restored tooth.
Romeed SA; Fok SL; Wilson NH
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Mar; 33(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 16512887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The influence of the loading mode on the stress distribution on the connector region of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic fixed partial denture.
Motta AB; Pereira LC; da Cunha AR; Duda FP
Artif Organs; 2008 Apr; 32(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 18370942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The influence of design parameters on the FEA-determined stress distribution in CAD-CAM produced all-ceramic dental crowns.
De Jager N; Pallav P; Feilzer AJ
Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 15705431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Influence of occlusal contact and cusp inclination on the biomechanical character of a maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.
Liu S; Liu Y; Xu J; Rong Q; Pan S
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1238-45. PubMed ID: 24836532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Non-linear elastic three-dimensional finite element analysis on the effect of endocrown material rigidity on alveolar bone remodeling process.
Aversa R; Apicella D; Perillo L; Sorrentino R; Zarone F; Ferrari M; Apicella A
Dent Mater; 2009 May; 25(5):678-90. PubMed ID: 19150574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Influence of core material on fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of restored root filled teeth.
Reill MI; Rosentritt M; Naumann M; Handel G
Int Endod J; 2008 May; 41(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 18355251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of non linearity of PDL on a restored tooth.
Uddanwadiker RV; Padole PM; Arya H
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Dec; 16(4):146-57. PubMed ID: 19177725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method.
Lin CL; Chang SH; Chang WJ; Kuo YC
Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Oct; 115(5):408-16. PubMed ID: 17850430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress in the periodontium.
Reddy MK; Vandana KL
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 7(4):102-7. PubMed ID: 16245640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. 3D FEA of Hollow and Solid Design Zirconia Dental Dowels.
Kayahan MB; Özkurt-Kayahan Z; Yay K; Kazazoğlu E
J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 25(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 25865169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Influence of prefabricated post dimensions on restored maxillary central incisors.
Rodríguez-Cervantes PJ; Sancho-Bru JL; Barjau-Escribano A; Forner-Navarro L; Pérez-González A; Sánchez-Marín FT
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 34(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 17244237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
