These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1879908)

  • 1. Facial anthropometry in newborns in Pondicherry.
    Shah M; Verma IC; Mahadevan S; Puri RK
    Indian J Pediatr; 1991; 58(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 1879908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
    Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults.
    Bozkir MG; Karakas P; Oguz O
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Jun; 26(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 14625792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Apr; 103(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 8480698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Craniofacial morphologic parameters in a Persian population: an anthropometric study.
    Amini F; Mashayekhi Z; Rahimi H; Morad G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1874-81. PubMed ID: 25203584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Looking at the adult face].
    Behrents RG
    Orthod Fr; 1997; 68(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9432622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of chinese faces and its application in evaluating facial deformity.
    Dong Y; Zhao Y; Bai S; Wu G; Zhou L; Wang B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1195-206. PubMed ID: 21050632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anthropometric Analysis of the Face.
    Zacharopoulos GV; Manios A; Kau CH; Velagrakis G; Tzanakakis GN; de Bree E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e71-5. PubMed ID: 26703056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of some facial anthropometric parameters in an Iranian population: infancy through adolescence.
    Jahanbin A; Rashed R; Yazdani R; Shahri NM; Kianifar H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):941-5. PubMed ID: 23714916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 284 healthy North American white children between 1 and 5 years of age.
    Farkas LG; Hreczko TM; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 12544216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laser scanning of the ear identifying the shape and position in subjects with normal facial symmetry.
    Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 29(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 10691137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Esthetic analysis of the cervicofacial region.
    Zweig BE
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2000 Sep; 8(2):1-11. PubMed ID: 11212552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multipurpose anthropometric facial anglemeter.
    Venkatadri G; Farkas LG; Kooiman J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1992 Sep; 90(3):507-10. PubMed ID: 1513900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive and normal adolescent boys and girls.
    Sforza C; Laino A; D'Alessio R; Grandi G; Tartaglia GM; Ferrario VF
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):799-807. PubMed ID: 18298221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary evaluation of an electromagnetic three-dimensional digitizer in facial anthropometry.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Cova M; Tartaglia G
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jan; 35(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 9482218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Correlation between sagittal photogrammetric measurements of the soft tissue profile and dental arches measurements].
    Diouf JS; Touré B; Ndiaye M; Badiane A; Diop-Bâ K; Ngom PI; Diagne F
    Orthod Fr; 2015 Dec; 86(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 26655417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A three-dimensional evaluation of Māori and New Zealand European faces.
    Antoun JS; Lawrence C; Leow A; Rongo R; Dias G; Farella M
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 25549519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does variation in lower anterior face height influence perceived attractiveness? A quantitative investigation.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    J Orthod; 2013 Sep; 40(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 24009320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anthropometric comparison of the idealized youth and hideous old man of Leonardo's profile drawings.
    Hwang K; Heo WY; Jeong JM; Hwang SW
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):2223-6. PubMed ID: 25340691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.