These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1879908)

  • 21. Distances between facial landmarks can be measured accurately with a new digital 3-dimensional video system.
    Schimmel M; Christou P; Houstis O; Herrmann FR; Kiliaridis S; Müller F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):580.e1-580.e10; discussion 580-1. PubMed ID: 20451768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements.
    Aung SC; Ngim RC; Lee ST
    Br J Plast Surg; 1995 Dec; 48(8):551-8. PubMed ID: 8548155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The attractive lip: A photomorphometric analysis.
    Penna V; Fricke A; Iblher N; Eisenhardt SU; Stark GB
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jul; 68(7):920-9. PubMed ID: 25921652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Novel methods for quantifying soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery.
    Guest E; Berry E; Morris D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 30(6):484-9. PubMed ID: 11829229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Anthropometry for syndromology.
    Lakshminarayana P; Janardhan K; David HS
    Indian J Pediatr; 1991; 58(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 1879907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. 3D-Analysis of Mouth, Nose and Eye Parameters in Children with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS).
    Blanck-Lubarsch M; Dirksen D; Feldmann R; Sauerland C; Hohoff A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jul; 16(14):. PubMed ID: 31315192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
    Weinberg SM; Naidoo S; Govier DP; Martin RA; Kane AA; Marazita ML
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 May; 17(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 16770184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Describing normal variations of head and face by using standard measurement and craniofacial variability index (CVI) in seven-year-old normal children.
    Ozdemir MB; Ilgaz A; Dilek A; Ayten H; Esat A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):470-4. PubMed ID: 17538305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malays.
    Ngeow WC; Aljunid ST
    Singapore Med J; 2009 May; 50(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 19495526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology.
    Liu Y; Kau CH; Talbert L; Pan F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1890-4. PubMed ID: 25072972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system.
    Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changes in facial dimensions assessed from lateral and frontal photographs. Part I--Methodology.
    Bishara SE; Jorgensen GJ; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 7572850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Craniofacial anthropometry in a Turkish population.
    Evereklioglu C; Doganay S; Er H; Gunduz A; Tercan M; Balat A; Cumurcu T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Mar; 39(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 11879080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Sagittal photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profile between two different racial groups: a comparative study].
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Jun; 38(150):5-14. PubMed ID: 26934767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.
    Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A longitudinal study of postoperative changes in the soft-tissue profile in bilateral cleft lip and palate from birth to 6 years.
    Hanada K; Krogman WM
    Am J Orthod; 1975 Apr; 67(4):363-76. PubMed ID: 1054914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lip posture following debonding of labial appliances based on conventional profile photographs.
    Abed Y; Har-Zion G; Redlich M
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 19216600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Facial soft tissue values in Persian adults with normal occlusion and well-balanced faces.
    Taki AA; Oguz F; Abuhijleh E
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):491-4. PubMed ID: 19413374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Normal inner canthal and outer orbital dimensions.
    Laestadius ND; Aase JM; Smith DW
    J Pediatr; 1969 Mar; 74(3):465-8. PubMed ID: 5764779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Anthropometric study of the upper lip and the nose of infants less than a year of age.
    Cho BC; Kim JY; Yang JD; Chung HY; Park JW; Hwang JH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 16432409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.