295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18799189)
1. Microvessel area using automated image analysis is reproducible and is associated with prognosis in breast cancer.
Sullivan CA; Ghosh S; Ocal IT; Camp RL; Rimm DL; Chung GG
Hum Pathol; 2009 Feb; 40(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 18799189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated immunofluorescence analysis defines microvessel area as a prognostic parameter in clear cell renal cell cancer.
Mertz KD; Demichelis F; Kim R; Schraml P; Storz M; Diener PA; Moch H; Rubin MA
Hum Pathol; 2007 Oct; 38(10):1454-62. PubMed ID: 17889675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Angiogenesis and some prognostic parameters of invasive ductal breast carcinoma in women.
Olewniczak S; Chosia M; Kwas A; Kram A; Domagała W
Pol J Pathol; 2002; 53(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 12597334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Angiogenesis as determined by computerised image analysis and the risk of early relapse in women with invasive ductal breast carcinoma.
Olewniczak S; Chosia M; Kołodziej B; Kwas A; Kram A; Domagała W
Pol J Pathol; 2003; 54(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12817881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of different immunohistochemical methods in the assessment of angiogenesis: lack of prognostic value in a group of 77 selected node-negative breast carcinomas.
Siitonen SM; Haapasalo HK; Rantala IS; Helin HJ; Isola JJ
Mod Pathol; 1995 Sep; 8(7):745-52. PubMed ID: 8539232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis.
Fox SB; Leek RD; Weekes MP; Whitehouse RM; Gatter KC; Harris AL
J Pathol; 1995 Nov; 177(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 8551390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing microvessel counts according to tumor zone in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Jitsuiki Y; Hasebe T; Tsuda H; Imoto S; Tsubono Y; Sasaki S; Mukai K
Mod Pathol; 1999 May; 12(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 10349987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI parameters with microvessel density and VEGF for assessment of angiogenesis in breast cancer.
Su MY; Cheung YC; Fruehauf JP; Yu H; Nalcioglu O; Mechetner E; Kyshtoobayeva A; Chen SC; Hsueh S; McLaren CE; Wan YL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Oct; 18(4):467-77. PubMed ID: 14508784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative analysis of breast cancer tissue microarrays shows high cox-2 expression is associated with poor outcome.
Zerkowski MP; Camp RL; Burtness BA; Rimm DL; Chung GG
Cancer Invest; 2007 Feb; 25(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 17364553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma: quantification of endothelial immunoreactivity by image analysis.
Schoell WM; Pieber D; Reich O; Lahousen M; Janicek M; Guecer F; Winter R
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 80(12):2257-62. PubMed ID: 9404702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-assisted analysis of biopsy specimen microvessels predicts the outcome of esophageal cancers treated with chemoradiotherapy.
Zhang SC; Hironaka S; Ohtsu A; Yoshida S; Hasebe T; Fukayama M; Ochiai A
Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Mar; 12(6):1735-42. PubMed ID: 16551857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of visual and automated assessment of microvessel density and their impact on outcome in primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer.
Mohammed ZM; Orange C; McMillan DC; Mallon E; Doughty JC; Edwards J; Going JJ
Hum Pathol; 2013 Aug; 44(8):1688-95. PubMed ID: 23574778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative determination of nuclear and cytoplasmic epidermal growth factor receptor expression in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer by using automated quantitative analysis.
Psyrri A; Yu Z; Weinberger PM; Sasaki C; Haffty B; Camp R; Rimm D; Burtness BA
Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Aug; 11(16):5856-62. PubMed ID: 16115926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of angiogenesis in cervical cancer: a comparison among three endothelial cell markers.
Vieira SC; Zeferino LC; Da Silva BB; Aparecida Pinto G; Vassallo J; Carasan GA; De Moraes NG
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Apr; 93(1):121-4. PubMed ID: 15047224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymphatic and angiogenic characteristics in breast cancer: morphometric analysis and prognostic implications.
Mohammed RA; Ellis IO; Elsheikh S; Paish EC; Martin SG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jan; 113(2):261-73. PubMed ID: 18293084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing microvessels and angiogenesis in human breast cancer, using VE-cadherin.
Martin TA; Watkins G; Lane J; Jiang WG
Histopathology; 2005 Apr; 46(4):422-30. PubMed ID: 15810954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An improved procedure to quantify tumour vascularity using true colour image analysis. Comparison with the manual hot-spot procedure in a human melanoma xenograft model.
van der Laak JA; Westphal JR; Schalkwijk LJ; Pahlplatz MM; Ruiter DJ; de Waal RM; de Wilde PC
J Pathol; 1998 Feb; 184(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 9602703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic value of measurements of angiogenesis in serous carcinoma of the ovary.
Palmer JE; Sant Cassia LJ; Irwin CJ; Morris AG; Rollason TP
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2007 Oct; 26(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 17885489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significance of intratumoral microvessel density quantification based on immunohistochemical detection of PECAM-1 and vWF in colorectal carcinoma from Iraqi patients.
Ahmed MM; Mohammed SH
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2010; 53(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 20699499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance of microvessel density in breast cancer of Thai women.
Kanjanapanjapol S; Wongwaisayawan S; Phuwapraisirisan S; Wilasrusmee C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Feb; 90(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 17375633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
