152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18799373)
1. Prospective, randomized, pathologist-blinded study of disposable alligator-jaw biopsy forceps for gastric mucosal biopsy.
Abudayyeh S; Hoffman J; El-Zimaity HT; Graham DY
Dig Liver Dis; 2009 May; 41(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 18799373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Oval Cup Forceps Versus Serrated Jaw Forceps in Gastric Biopsy.
Sussman DA; Deshpande AR; Shankar U; Barkin JA; Medina AM; Poppiti RJ; Cubeddu LX; Barkin JS
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Aug; 61(8):2338-2343. PubMed ID: 27003145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of endoscopic biopsy forceps characteristics on tissue specimens: results of a prospective randomized study.
Woods KL; Anand BS; Cole RA; Osato MS; Genta RM; Malaty H; Gurer IE; Rossi DD
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 9925695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adequacy of mucosal sampling with the "two-bite" forceps technique: a prospective, randomized, blinded study.
Padda S; Shah I; Ramirez FC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Feb; 57(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 12556778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An observer-blinded, prospective, randomized comparison of forceps for endoscopic esophageal biopsy.
Schafer TW; Hollis-Perry KM; Mondragon RM; Brann OS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11818921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy.
Chu KM; Yuen ST; Wong WM; Wong KW; Lai KC; Hu WH; Leung SY; Yuen MF; Lam SK; Wong BC
Endoscopy; 2003 Apr; 35(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 12664392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus.
Martinek J; Maluskova J; Stefanova M; Tuckova I; Suchanek S; Vackova Z; Krajciova J; Kollar M; Zavoral M; Spicak J
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(17):5328-35. PubMed ID: 25954107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: comparison with standard forceps of sample size and adequacy of specimen.
Turk DJ; Kozarek RA; Botoman VA; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ
J Clin Gastroenterol; 1991 Feb; 13(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 2007750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective, randomized comparison of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Yang R; Naritoku W; Laine L
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(6):671-4. PubMed ID: 7859962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of three types of biopsy forceps in the endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus.
Dolwani S; Saleem H; Thompson IW; Allison MC
Endoscopy; 2002 Dec; 34(12):946-9. PubMed ID: 12471536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps.
Cartwright JA; Hill TL; Smith S; Shaw D
J Vet Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 30(4):1002-7. PubMed ID: 27255591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forceps Biopsies Are Not Reliable in the Workup of Large Colorectal Lesions Referred for Endoscopic Resection: Should They Be Abandoned?
Rönnow CF; Uedo N; Stenfors I; Toth E; Thorlacius H
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 Sep; 62(9):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 31318770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adequacy of disposable biopsy forceps for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a direct comparison with reusable forceps.
Yang R; Vuitch F; Wright K; McCarthy J
Gastrointest Endosc; 1990; 36(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 2210280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A New Method for Endoscopic Sampling of Submucosal Tissue in the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Comparison of the Biopsy Forceps and a New Drill Instrument.
Walther C; Jeremiasen M; Rissler P; Johansson JL; Larsson MS; Walther BS
Surg Innov; 2016 Dec; 23(6):572-580. PubMed ID: 27126252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic quality of biopsy specimens: comparison between a conventional biopsy forceps and multibite forceps.
Fantin AC; Neuweiler J; Binek JS; Suter WR; Meyenberger C
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Nov; 54(5):600-4. PubMed ID: 11677476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic small-capacity forceps increase the pathological diagnosis of gastric indefinite neoplasia.
Matsuo Y; Yasuda H; Kato M; Kiyokawa H; Ozawa M; Sato Y; Ikeda Y; Ozawa SI; Yamashita M; Fujino T; Yamamoto H; Takagi M; Itoh F
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jul; 29(4):481-487. PubMed ID: 30249564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does a small biopsied gastric specimen limit the usage of two directional transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy?
Rhee KH; Han HS; Lee SY; Seo TH; Ko SY; Kim BK; Sung IK; Jin CJ; Min YI
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Feb; 25(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 19968748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are endoscopic biopsies of small bowel as good as suction biopsies for diagnosis of enteropathy?
Thomson M; Kitching P; Jones A; Walker-Smith JA; Phillips A
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 1999 Oct; 29(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 10512404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial.
Rizzo J; Bernstein D; Gress F
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10699767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic multiple biopsy and rapid diagnosis by in situ fixation and histopathologic processing.
Zimmon DS; Smith FB; Manheimer F; Fan C; Njiwaji C; Aksenov S; Chattoo P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):333-342. PubMed ID: 27988287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]