178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18801015)
1. The rating of perceived exertion during competitive running scales with time.
Faulkner J; Parfitt G; Eston R
Psychophysiology; 2008 Nov; 45(6):977-85. PubMed ID: 18801015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of anticipation during unknown or unexpected exercise duration on rating of perceived exertion, affect, and physiological function.
Baden DA; McLean TL; Tucker R; Noakes TD; St Clair Gibson A
Br J Sports Med; 2005 Oct; 39(10):742-6; discussion 742-6. PubMed ID: 16183771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scalar-linear increases in perceived exertion are dissociated from residual physiological responses during sprint-distance triathlon.
Taylor D; Smith MF
Physiol Behav; 2013 Jun; 118():178-84. PubMed ID: 23719666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of antecedent fatiguing activity on the relationship between perceived exertion and physiological activity during a constant load exercise task.
Eston R; Faulkner J; St Clair Gibson A; Noakes T; Parfitt G
Psychophysiology; 2007 Sep; 44(5):779-86. PubMed ID: 17617170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pre-planned Vs. Executed Real-Time Pacing Strategies during 3-km Race: Role of Rating Perceived Exertion.
Alves DL; Cruz R; Bara CLBP; Osiecki R; Lima JRP; De-Oliveira FR
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2020 Sep; 91(3):469-477. PubMed ID: 31986105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Metabolic and performance responses to uphill and downhill running in distance runners.
Staab JS; Agnew JW; Siconolfi SF
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 Jan; 24(1):124-7. PubMed ID: 1548986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception of fatigue during simulated competition.
Joseph T; Johnson B; Battista RA; Wright G; Dodge C; Porcari JP; de Koning JJ; Foster C
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Feb; 40(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 18202562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The perceptual response to exercise of progressively increasing intensity in children aged 7-8 years: validation of a pictorial curvilinear ratings of perceived exertion scale.
Eston RG; Lambrick DM; Rowlands AV
Psychophysiology; 2009 Jul; 46(4):843-51. PubMed ID: 19470130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Thermoregulatory responses during competitive singles tennis.
Morante SM; Brotherhood JR
Br J Sports Med; 2008 Sep; 42(9):736-41. PubMed ID: 18048443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-pacing in interval training: a teleoanticipatory approach.
Edwards AM; Bentley MB; Mann ME; Seaholme TS
Psychophysiology; 2011 Jan; 48(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 20536904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of induced erythrocythemia upon 5-mile treadmill run time.
Williams MH; Wesseldine S; Somma T; Schuster R
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1981; 13(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 7253868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ratings of perceived exertion throughout an ultramarathon during carbohydrate ingestion.
Utter AC; Kang J; Nieman DC; Vinci DM; McAnulty SR; Dumke CL; McAnulty L
Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Aug; 97(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 14604037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quercetin does not affect rating of perceived exertion in athletes during the Western States endurance run.
Utter AC; Nieman DC; Kang J; Dumke CL; Quindry JC; McAnulty SR; McAnulty LS
Res Sports Med; 2009; 17(2):71-83. PubMed ID: 19479626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of PCERT and OMNI walk/run ratings of perceived exertion.
Roemmich JN; Barkley JE; Epstein LH; Lobarinas CL; White TM; Foster JH
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 May; 38(5):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16672857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual responses in free vs. constant pace exercise.
Garcin M; Danel M; Billat V
Int J Sports Med; 2008 Jun; 29(6):453-9. PubMed ID: 18004686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Knowledge of the endpoint: effect on perceptual values.
Coquart JB; Garcin M
Int J Sports Med; 2008 Dec; 29(12):976-9. PubMed ID: 18600607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rating of perceived exertion after 12 weeks of high-intensity, intermittent sprinting.
Heydari M; Boutcher SH
Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Feb; 116(1):340-51. PubMed ID: 23829159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optic flow influences perceived exertion and distance estimation but not running pace.
Parry D; Micklewright D
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Aug; 46(8):1658-65. PubMed ID: 24500533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Footwear and running cardio-respiratory responses.
Rubin DA; Butler RJ; Beckman B; Hackney AC
Int J Sports Med; 2009 May; 30(5):379-82. PubMed ID: 19199221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of accurate and inaccurate distance feedback on performance markers and pacing strategies during running.
Faulkner J; Arnold T; Eston R
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2011 Dec; 21(6):e176-83. PubMed ID: 21039898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
