BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18801326)

  • 1. Farm questionnaires for monitoring genetically modified crops: a case study using GM maize.
    Schmidt K; Wilhelm R; Schmidtke J; Beissner L; Mönkemeyer W; Böttinger P; Sweet J; Schiemann J
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2008; 7(3):163-79. PubMed ID: 18801326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivation.
    Sanvido O; Romeis J; Bigler F
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():235-78. PubMed ID: 17522828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect on soil chemistry of genetically modified (GM) vs. non-GM maize.
    Liu N; Zhu P; Peng C; Kang L; Gao H; Clarke NJ; Clarke JL
    GM Crops; 2010; 1(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 21844670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrating soil conservation practices and glyphosate-resistant crops: impacts on soil.
    Locke MA; Zablotowicz RM; Reddy KN
    Pest Manag Sci; 2008 Apr; 64(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 18275105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method to search for optimal field allocations of transgenic maize in the context of co-existence.
    Devos Y; Cougnon M; Thas O; Reheul D
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2008; 7(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18549771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-fertilization between genetically modified and non-genetically modified maize crops in Uruguay.
    Galeano P; Debat CM; Ruibal F; Fraguas LF; Galván GA
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(3):147-54. PubMed ID: 21975255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prioritizing GM crop monitoring sites in the dynamics of cultivation systems and their environment.
    Bethwell C; Müller HJ; Eulenstein F; Graef F
    J Environ Monit; 2012 May; 14(5):1453-61. PubMed ID: 22495474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring the commercial cultivation of Bt maize in Europe--conclusions and recommendations for future monitoring practice.
    Wilhelm R; Sanvido O; Castanera P; Schmidt K; Schiemann J
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2009; 8(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 20883660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic engineering of maize (Zea mays) for high-level tolerance to treatment with the herbicide dicamba.
    Cao M; Sato SJ; Behrens M; Jiang WZ; Clemente TE; Weeks DP
    J Agric Food Chem; 2011 Jun; 59(11):5830-4. PubMed ID: 21133415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attitudes of European farmers towards GM crop adoption.
    Areal FJ; Riesgo L; Rodríguez-Cerezo E
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2011 Dec; 9(9):945-57. PubMed ID: 21923717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GM crop cultivation surges, but novel traits languish.
    Peng W
    Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Apr; 29(4):302. PubMed ID: 21478839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual detection of genetically modified maize varieties in non-identity-preserved maize samples.
    Akiyama H; Sakata K; Kondo K; Tanaka A; Liu MS; Oguchi T; Furui S; Kitta K; Hino A; Teshima R
    J Agric Food Chem; 2008 Mar; 56(6):1977-83. PubMed ID: 18298063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sampling and modeling for the quantification of adventitious genetically modified presence in maize.
    Allnutt TR; Dwyer M; McMillan J; Henry C; Langrell S
    J Agric Food Chem; 2008 May; 56(9):3232-7. PubMed ID: 18419127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Literature review of the dispersal of transgenes from genetically modified maize].
    Ricroch A; Bergé JB; Messéan A
    C R Biol; 2009 Oct; 332(10):861-75. PubMed ID: 19819407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Swedish farmers attitudes, expectations and fears in relation to growing genetically modified crops.
    Lehrman A; Johnson K
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2008; 7(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 18801325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of herbicide regimes and the associated potential environmental effects of glyphosate-resistant crops versus what they replace in Europe.
    Kleter GA; Harris C; Stephenson G; Unsworth J
    Pest Manag Sci; 2008 Apr; 64(4):479-88. PubMed ID: 18078305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Global impact of biotech crops: environmental effects, 1996-2010.
    Brookes G; Barfoot P
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 22534352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of potential impacts associated with gene flow from transgenic hybrids to Mexican maize landraces.
    Duncan B; Leyva-Guerrero E; Werk T; Stojšin D; Baltazar BM; García-Lara S; Zavala-López M; de la Fuente-Martínez JM; Meng C
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Dec; 28(5-6):509-523. PubMed ID: 31250247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EU biotech crop regulations and environmental risk: a case of the emperor's new clothes?
    Morris SH
    Trends Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 17113665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glyphosate-resistant crops: adoption, use and future considerations.
    Dill GM; Cajacob CA; Padgette SR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2008 Apr; 64(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 18078304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.