1156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18801501)
1. Indications for preoperative prostate biopsy in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer.
Thomas C; Wiesner C; Melchior S; Gillitzer R; Schmidt F; Thüroff JW
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1938-41; discussion 1941. PubMed ID: 18801501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome of patients with fortuitous prostate cancer after radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer.
Delongchamps NB; Mao K; Theng H; Zerbib M; Debré B; Peyromaure M
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):946-50. PubMed ID: 16126325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10.
Bastian PJ; Gonzalgo ML; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Presti JC; Mangold LA; Humphreys E; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Freedland SJ
Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(6):1265-72. PubMed ID: 16900523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidental prostate cancer at radical cystoprostatectomy: implications for apex-sparing surgery.
Gakis G; Schilling D; Bedke J; Sievert KD; Stenzl A
BJU Int; 2010 Feb; 105(4):468-71. PubMed ID: 20102366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystoprostatectomy for localized bladder cancer with 3-year oncological followup: a single surgeon experience.
Hemal AK; Kolla SB
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2340-3. PubMed ID: 17936813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
Graefen M; Haese A; Pichlmeier U; Hammerer PG; Noldus J; Butz K; Erbersdobler A; Henke RP; Michl U; Fernandez S; Huland H
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):857-63. PubMed ID: 11176486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PCA3 score before radical prostatectomy predicts extracapsular extension and tumor volume.
Whitman EJ; Groskopf J; Ali A; Chen Y; Blase A; Furusato B; Petrovics G; Ibrahim M; Elsamanoudi S; Cullen J; Sesterhenn IA; Brassell S; Rittenhouse H; Srivastava S; McLeod DG
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1975-8; discussion 1978-9. PubMed ID: 18801539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should prostate cancer status be determined in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy?
Sanli O; Acar O; Celtik M; Oktar T; Kilicaraslan I; Ozcan F; Tunc M; Esen T
Urol Int; 2006; 77(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 17135779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate volume measured preoperatively predicts for organ-confined disease in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Bianco FJ; Mallah KN; Korets R; Hricak H; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):343-6. PubMed ID: 17320675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination.
Tsuzuki T; Hernandez DJ; Aydin H; Trock B; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):450-3. PubMed ID: 15643200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 to harbor a higher grade cancer.
Gofrit ON; Zorn KC; Taxy JB; Lin S; Zagaja GP; Steinberg GD; Shalhav AL
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1925-8. PubMed ID: 17868725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the prostate peripheral zone/capsule in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy: defining risk with prostate capsule sparing cystectomy.
Weizer AZ; Shah RB; Lee CT; Gilbert SM; Daignault S; Montie JE; Wood DP
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18047952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors predicting prostatic biopsy Gleason sum under grading.
Stackhouse DA; Sun L; Schroeck FR; Jayachandran J; Caire AA; Acholo CO; Robertson CN; Albala DM; Polascik TJ; Donatucci CF; Maloney KE; Moul JW
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):118-22; discussion 123-4. PubMed ID: 19447436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
