1066 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18801512)
1. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.
Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Hu JC; Wang Q; Pashos CL; Lipsitz SR; Keating NL
J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(14):2278-84. PubMed ID: 18467718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Prasad SM; Gu X; Lavelle R; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 21074198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy surgeon volume.
Choi WW; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; D'Amico AV; Williams SB; Hu JC
Urol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 30(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 20822929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of prostate: oncologic and functional outcomes of 100 cases.
Do M; Haefner T; Liatsikos E; Kallidonis P; Hicks J; Dietel A; Horn LC; Rabenalt R; Stolzenburg JU
Urology; 2010 Jun; 75(6):1348-52. PubMed ID: 19914701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after open and minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: experience from Australasia.
Cathcart P; Murphy DG; Moon D; Costello AJ; Frydenberg M
BJU Int; 2011 Apr; 107 Suppl 3():11-9. PubMed ID: 21492370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Retropubic and perineal approach: plea for perineal radical prostatectomy].
Salomon L; Colombel M; Patard JJ; Contremoulins I; Bellot J; Lefrére-Belda MA; Gasman D; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prog Urol; 1997 Dec; 7(6):976-83. PubMed ID: 9490143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: results from the 100% Medicare sample.
Kowalczyk KJ; Levy JM; Caplan CF; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Gu X; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):803-9. PubMed ID: 22209053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Prasad SM; Keating NL; Wang Q; Pashos CL; Lipsitz S; Richie JP; Hu JC
Urology; 2008 Sep; 72(3):647-52; discussion 652-3. PubMed ID: 18649928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of outpatient narcotic prescribing patterns after minimally invasive versus retropubic and perineal radical prostatectomy.
Kowalczyk KJ; Weinburg AC; Gu X; Yu HY; Lipsitz SR; Williams SB; Hu JC
J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):1843-8. PubMed ID: 21944990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of hospital procedure volume and resident training on clinical outcomes and resource use in radical retropubic prostatectomy surgery in the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Ku TS; Kane CJ; Sen S; Henderson WG; Dudley RA; Cason BA
J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):272-8; discussion 278-9. PubMed ID: 18001784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obesity and capsular incision at the time of open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Freedland SJ; Grubb KA; Yiu SK; Nielsen ME; Mangold LA; Isaacs WB; Epstein JI; Partin AW
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1798-801; discussion 1801. PubMed ID: 16217290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.
Hu JC; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; Barry MJ; D'Amico AV; Weinberg AC; Keating NL
JAMA; 2009 Oct; 302(14):1557-64. PubMed ID: 19826025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: an outcomes-based evolution.
Harris MJ
Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 17084506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical outcomes for men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate.
Jaffe J; Stakhovsky O; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G; Rozet F
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):483-7; discussion 487. PubMed ID: 17561162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
