288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18802462)
1. Screening and replication using the same data set: testing strategies for family-based studies in which all probands are affected.
Murphy A; Weiss ST; Lange C
PLoS Genet; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000197. PubMed ID: 18802462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Weighted Transmission Disequilibrium Test for Family Trio Association Design.
Fang H; Yang Y; Chen L
Hum Hered; 2018; 83(4):196-209. PubMed ID: 30865952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the analysis of copy-number variations in genome-wide association studies: a translation of the family-based association test.
Ionita-Laza I; Perry GH; Raby BA; Klanderman B; Lee C; Laird NM; Weiss ST; Lange C
Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 32(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 18228561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the genome-wide analysis of copy number variants in family-based designs: methods for combining family-based and population-based information for testing dichotomous or quantitative traits, or completely ascertained samples.
Murphy A; Won S; Rogers A; Chu JH; Raby BA; Lange C
Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 34(6):582-90. PubMed ID: 20718041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-stage testing strategies for genome-wide association studies in family-based designs.
Murphy A; T Weiss S; Lange C
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 620():485-96. PubMed ID: 20652517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using the noninformative families in family-based association tests: a powerful new testing strategy.
Lange C; DeMeo D; Silverman EK; Weiss ST; Laird NM
Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Oct; 73(4):801-11. PubMed ID: 14502464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of family-based tests for linkage disequilibrium between a quantitative trait and a genetic marker.
Ewens WJ; Li M; Spielman RS
PLoS Genet; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000180. PubMed ID: 18818728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic screening and replication using the same data set in family-based association testing.
Van Steen K; McQueen MB; Herbert A; Raby B; Lyon H; Demeo DL; Murphy A; Su J; Datta S; Rosenow C; Christman M; Silverman EK; Laird NM; Weiss ST; Lange C
Nat Genet; 2005 Jul; 37(7):683-91. PubMed ID: 15937480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The expected power of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium testing using single nucleotide polymorphism markers for detecting a low-frequency disease variant.
Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
Ann Hum Genet; 2002 Jul; 66(Pt 4):297-306. PubMed ID: 12418970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New powerful approaches for family-based association tests with longitudinal measurements.
Ding X; Lange C; Xu X; Laird N
Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 18798838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transmission/disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits.
Zhu X; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 11119297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
Wang J
Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FBAT-SNP-PC: an approach for multiple markers and single trait in family-based association tests.
Rakovski CS; Weiss ST; Laird NM; Lange C
Hum Hered; 2008; 66(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 18382091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Weighted variance FBAT: a powerful method for including covariates in FBAT analyses.
Lu AT; Cantor RM
Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 17323371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association studies of QTL for multi-allele markers by mixed models.
Fan R; Jung J
Hum Hered; 2002; 54(3):132-50. PubMed ID: 12626846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-stage association tests for genome-wide association studies based on family data with arbitrary family structure.
Feng T; Zhang S; Sha Q
Eur J Hum Genet; 2007 Nov; 15(11):1169-75. PubMed ID: 17653107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A general framework for robust and efficient association analysis in family-based designs: quantitative and dichotomous phenotypes.
Won S; Lange C
Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(25):4482-98. PubMed ID: 23740776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The power of genome-wide association studies of complex disease genes: statistical limitations of indirect approaches using SNP markers.
Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
J Hum Genet; 2001; 46(8):478-82. PubMed ID: 11501946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An omnibus test for family-based association studies with multiple SNPs and multiple phenotypes.
Lasky-Su J; Murphy A; McQueen MB; Weiss S; Lange C
Eur J Hum Genet; 2010 Jun; 18(6):720-5. PubMed ID: 20087406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
