134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18802785)
21. The Grand Inquisitor's choice: comment on the CEJA report on withholding information from patients.
Pirakitikulr D; Bursztajn HJ
J Clin Ethics; 2006; 17(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 17330720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Research on medical practices and the ethics of disclosure.
Magnus D; Wilfond BS
Pediatrics; 2015 Feb; 135(2):208-10. PubMed ID: 25583909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Must research participants understand randomization?
Wendler D
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):3-8. PubMed ID: 19180378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [When the patient can't consent to participation in a trial: the Ethics Review Board should take over the decision responsibility from the relatives].
Risberg B
Lakartidningen; 2010 Jul 21-Aug 10; 107(29-31):1787. PubMed ID: 20812567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Understanding randomization: helpful strategies.
Brody H; Childress AM
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 19180384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research.
Orentlicher D
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 16295261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):19-36. PubMed ID: 20945264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clarifying the ethics of clinical research: a path toward avoiding the therapeutic misconception.
Appelbaum PS
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 12189066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Is respect for autonomy defensible?
Wilson J
J Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 33(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 17526687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials.
Miller FG; Brody H
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):19-28. PubMed ID: 12854452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The dirty little truth: we want them to understand, but not really..
Morreim H
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 19180381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A teachable moment: research ethics revisited.
Cohn F; Manetta A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):2. PubMed ID: 12548186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cluster randomized trials: another look.
Macklin R
Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 24375386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Informed consent in acute myocardial infarction research.
Gammelgaard A
J Med Philos; 2004 Aug; 29(4):417-34. PubMed ID: 15370302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparing risks of alternative medical diagnosis using Bayesian arguments.
Fenton N; Neil M
J Biomed Inform; 2010 Aug; 43(4):485-95. PubMed ID: 20152931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of study-related patient information sheets in randomised neuro-oncology phase III-trials.
Reinert C; Kremmler L; Burock S; Bogdahn U; Wick W; Gleiter CH; Koller M; Hau P
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 24103146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. To study, perchance to treat.
Trachtman H
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 19180382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Ethical approval should be given for research concerning severely ill elderly].
Ekerstad N
Lakartidningen; 2011 Oct 19-25; 108(42):2072-3. PubMed ID: 22165531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Patients' expressed and unexpressed needs for information for informed consent.
Volpe RL
J Clin Ethics; 2010; 21(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 20465076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Non-completion and informed consent.
Wertheimer A
J Med Ethics; 2014 Feb; 40(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 23371314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
