These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1880285)

  • 1. Field studies: industrial exposures.
    Johnson DL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 1880285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human temporary threshold shift (TTS) and damage risk.
    Melnick W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 1880282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling the interactions between noise exposure and other variables.
    Humes LE; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 1880287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The importance of "temporal pattern" in traumatic impulse noise exposures.
    Danielson R; Henderson D; Gratton MA; Bianchi L; Salvi R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):209-18. PubMed ID: 1880291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The energy spectrum of an impulse: its relation to hearing loss.
    Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA; Hsueh KD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 1880289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of intermittence in PTS.
    Ward WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):164-9. PubMed ID: 1880284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impulse noise: some definitions, physical acoustics and other considerations.
    Hamernik RP; Hsueh KD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):189-96. PubMed ID: 1880288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying non-Gaussian noise exposure: The applicability of the equal energy hypothesis.
    Hamernik RP; Qiu W; Davis B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2245-54. PubMed ID: 17902860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanisms of noise-induced inner ear damage.
    Dieroff HG
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 1993; 88():238-49. PubMed ID: 8460367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise exposure from leisure activities: a review.
    Clark WW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 1880286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing loss in the chinchilla from impact and continuous noise exposure.
    Dunn DE; Davis RR; Merry CJ; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1979-85. PubMed ID: 1669963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recent studies of temporary threshold shift (TTS) and permanent threshold shift (PTS) in animals.
    Clark WW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):155-63. PubMed ID: 1880283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of peak pressure and energy of impulses.
    Patterson JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 1880290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing threshold shifts from repeated 6-h daily exposure to impact noise.
    Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA; Davis RI; Lei SF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):444-53. PubMed ID: 8120255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distribution of risk factors for hearing loss: implications for evaluating risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Prince MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):557-67. PubMed ID: 12186037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of methods for early detection of noise vulnerability of the inner ear. Amplitude reduction of otoacoustic emissions are most sensitive at submaximal noise impulse exposure].
    Plinkert PK; Hemmert W; Zenner HP
    HNO; 1995 Feb; 43(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 7713771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of occupational and nonoccupational noise exposures in Sweden.
    Neitzel RL; Svensson EB; Sayler SK; Ann-Christin J
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(72):270-8. PubMed ID: 25209036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the limitation of brainstem auditory evoked potentials for indication of susceptibility to noise.
    Podoshin L; Ben-David J; SuĊ‚kowski W; Fradis M; Pratt H; Djerassi L
    Pol J Occup Med Environ Health; 1991; 4(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 1817681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of acoustic overstimulation on spectral and temporal processing in the amphibian auditory nerve.
    Penna M; Narins PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1617-29. PubMed ID: 2708678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of moderate-intensity noise on the compound action potential evoked by tone bursts in the guinea pig, Cavia porcellus.
    Walger M; Schmidt U; von Wedel H
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 4055533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.