These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1880287)

  • 21. Additivity of loud-sound--induced threshold losses in the cat under conditions of active or inactive cochlear efferent-mediated protection.
    Rajan R
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Apr; 75(4):1601-18. PubMed ID: 8727399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of acoustic overstimulation on spectral and temporal processing in the amphibian auditory nerve.
    Penna M; Narins PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1617-29. PubMed ID: 2708678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contribution of animal studies to our understanding of impulse noise induced hearing loss.
    Hamernik RP; Henderson D; Salvi RJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):128-46. PubMed ID: 6939081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporary threshold shifts at 1500 and 2000 Hz induced by loud voice signals communicated through earphones in the pinball industry.
    Idota N; Horie S; Tsutsui T; Inoue J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Oct; 54(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 20584863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Commentary on the regulatory implications of noise-induced cochlear neuropathy.
    Dobie RA; Humes LE
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):74-78. PubMed ID: 27849127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Noise-induced cochlear hypoxia is intensity dependent, correlates with hearing loss and precedes reduction of cochlear blood flow.
    Lamm K; Arnold W
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(3):148-60. PubMed ID: 9390798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of sound preconditioning on hearing loss from low or middle-frequency noise exposure.
    Liu YG; He YJ; Li DD; Zheng SX; Niu CM
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2000 Oct; 13(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 11894866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of impulse intensity and the number of impulses on hearing and cochlear pathology in the chinchilla.
    Hamernik RP; Patterson JH; Salvi RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1118-29. PubMed ID: 3571729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impulse noise: critical review.
    Henderson D; Hamernik RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):569-84. PubMed ID: 3745686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of well-known risk factors for hearing loss in a longitudinal twin study.
    Johnson AC; Bogo R; Farah A; Karlsson KK; Muhr P; Sjöström M; Svensson EB; Skjönsberg Å; Svartengren M
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):63-73. PubMed ID: 27957874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fatigue Modeling via Mammalian Auditory System for Prediction of Noise Induced Hearing Loss.
    Sun P; Qin J; Campbell K
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():753864. PubMed ID: 26691685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Examination of reaction time--auditory brainstem responses--ABR in noise induced temporary and permanent threshold shift].
    Janczewski G; Kochanek K; Dawidowicz J; Tanzariello A; Dobrzyński P; Bardadin J
    Med Pr; 1991; 42(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 1921713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Safety limit warning levels for the avoidance of excessive sound amplification to protect against further hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):829-836. PubMed ID: 28687060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Manifestations of intense noise stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emission and threshold microstructure: experiment and model.
    Furst M; Reshef I; Attias J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Feb; 91(2):1003-14. PubMed ID: 1313463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Temporary threshold shift in noise exposure and overhead work].
    Schultz K; Dibbern N; Münzberger E
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1987 Apr; 33(4):200-2. PubMed ID: 3604339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Call centers and noise-induced hearing loss.
    Beyan AC; Demiral Y; Cimrin AH; Ergor A
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(81):113-6. PubMed ID: 26960789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The use of an automatic device for recording the recovery time from auditory fatigue in flight personnel exposed to noise].
    Ceresia G; Cesareo G; De Benedetto M; Pianura CM
    Minerva Med; 1983 Jan; 74(3-4):113-5. PubMed ID: 6828243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in forward masking after a temporary and a permanent noise-induced hearing loss.
    Duan ML; Canlon B
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(6):328-38. PubMed ID: 9390813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An assessment of threshold shifts in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians using conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry.
    Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):643-8. PubMed ID: 17804978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Noise dosimetry for tactical environments.
    Smalt CJ; Lacirignola J; Davis SK; Calamia PT; Collins PP
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():42-54. PubMed ID: 27876480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.