194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18802914)
1. Perioperative complications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS): comparison of MIS and open interbody fusion techniques.
Bagan B; Patel N; Deutsch H; Harrop J; Sharan A; Vaccaro AR; Ratliff JK
Surg Technol Int; 2008; 17():281-6. PubMed ID: 18802914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of minimally invasive spine surgery on perioperative complications in overweight or obese patients.
Park P; Upadhyaya C; Garton HJ; Foley KT
Neurosurgery; 2008 Mar; 62(3):693-9; discussion 693-9. PubMed ID: 18425016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws: comparison to muscle damage and minimally invasive techniques.
Dickerman RD; East JW; Winters K; Tackett J; Hajovsky-Pietla A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):E923-5. PubMed ID: 19940722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.
Rodgers WB; Gerber EJ; Patterson J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21192221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Wang HL; Lü FZ; Jiang JY; Ma X; Xia XL; Wang LX
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Dec; 124(23):3868-74. PubMed ID: 22340311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
Lau D; Lee JG; Han SJ; Lu DC; Chou D
J Clin Neurosci; 2011 May; 18(5):624-7. PubMed ID: 21349719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults.
Lee P; Fessler RG
J Clin Neurosci; 2012 Jan; 19(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 22133812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Witham TF; Aaronson OS; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Feb; 54(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 21506066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profile.
Knight RQ; Schwaegler P; Hanscom D; Roh J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Feb; 22(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 19190432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusions.
Shen FH; Samartzis D; Khanna AJ; Anderson DG
Orthop Clin North Am; 2007 Jul; 38(3):373-86; abstract vi. PubMed ID: 17629985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Obesity and self-reported outcome after minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
Rosen DS; Ferguson SD; Ogden AT; Huo D; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2008 Nov; 63(5):956-60; discussion 960. PubMed ID: 19005386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early complications of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the obese.
Rodgers WB; Cox CS; Gerber EJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):393-7. PubMed ID: 20084027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of single intervertebral cage and single side pedicle screw fixation versus bilateral cages and screw fixation.
Moreland DB; Asch HL; Czajka GA; Overkamp JA; Sitzman DM
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2009 Jun; 52(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 19650016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):479-84. PubMed ID: 21336176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies.
Stevens KJ; Spenciner DB; Griffiths KL; Kim KD; Zwienenberg-Lee M; Alamin T; Bammer R
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 16760779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An open, minimally invasive approach to the lumbar spine.
Dewald CJ; Millikan KW; Hammerberg KW; Doolas A; Dewald RL
Am Surg; 1999 Jan; 65(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 9915535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
