154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18803476)
1. Cancer screening: the clash of science and intuition.
Kramer BS; Croswell JM
Annu Rev Med; 2009; 60():125-37. PubMed ID: 18803476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The science of early detection.
Kramer BS
Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 15283894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for cancer: evaluating the evidence.
Gates TJ
Am Fam Physician; 2001 Feb; 63(3):513-22. PubMed ID: 11272300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Problems in using survival data of cancer patients as a method of gauging the effectiveness of cancer control efforts].
Oshima A
Gan No Rinsho; 1988 Oct; 34(12):1637-41. PubMed ID: 3193607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bias in breast cancer research in the screening era.
Cox B; Sneyd MJ
Breast; 2013 Dec; 22(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 23988397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cancer screenings, diagnostic technology evolution, and cancer control.
Stracci F
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 471():107-36. PubMed ID: 19109777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the efficacy of cancer screening.
Jacklyn G; Bell K; Hayen A
Public Health Res Pract; 2017 Jul; 27(3):. PubMed ID: 28765860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Principles of cancer screening: lessons from history and study design issues.
Croswell JM; Ransohoff DF; Kramer BS
Semin Oncol; 2010 Jun; 37(3):202-15. PubMed ID: 20709205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efforts in fighting against cancer in Croatia have to be focused on the primary health care.
Trtica LM; Strnad M; Gmajnić R; Ebling B; Ebling Z; Marković I; Samija M
Coll Antropol; 2008 Sep; 32(3):709-24. PubMed ID: 18982742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of length biased sampling of unobserved sojourn times on the survival distribution when disease is screen detected.
Kafadar K; Prorok PC
Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(16):2116-46. PubMed ID: 19424959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of cancer biology, lead time bias, and length bias in the debate about cancer screening tests.
Kay BR; Witte DL
J Insur Med; 1991; 23(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 10147769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Commentary: Cohort studies of the efficacy of screening for cancer.
Weiss NS
Epidemiology; 2015 May; 26(3):362-4. PubMed ID: 25764250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree.
Kahneman D; Klein G
Am Psychol; 2009 Sep; 64(6):515-26. PubMed ID: 19739881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re: Prostate cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer screening trial: update on findings from the initial four rounds of screening in a randomized trial.
Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(2):143-4. PubMed ID: 19076150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Japanese guideline for prostate cancer screening.
Hamashima C; Nakayama T; Sagawa M; Saito H; Sobue T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jun; 39(6):339-51. PubMed ID: 19346535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Dentification and correction of the lead-time bias and length bias in cancer screening studies].
Yang Z; Zhou JC; Chen R; Wei WW
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 53(11):1183-1187. PubMed ID: 31683411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why are a high overdiagnosis probability and a long lead time for prostate cancer screening so important?
Barry MJ; Mulley AJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Mar; 101(6):362-3. PubMed ID: 19276451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of timely information in national cancer screening programmes.
Droljc A; Grbec T; Orel A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():81-5. PubMed ID: 19745271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals.
Juslin P; Winman A; Hansson P
Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):678-703. PubMed ID: 17638502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
