BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

780 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18804255)

  • 1. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of control strategies using the benchmark simulation model No1 (BSM1).
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodriguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(3):491-9. PubMed ID: 19214003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple-objective evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control alternatives.
    Flores-Alsina X; Gallego A; Feijoo G; Rodriguez-Roda I
    J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1193-201. PubMed ID: 20167418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater treatment plant model applications: prioritizing sources of uncertainty.
    Sin G; Gernaey KV; Neumann MB; van Loosdrecht MC; Gujer W
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):639-51. PubMed ID: 20828785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: a critical discussion using an example from design.
    Sin G; Gernaey KV; Neumann MB; van Loosdrecht MC; Gujer W
    Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(11):2894-906. PubMed ID: 19447462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
    Ekama GA
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multi-criteria evaluation of organic amendments used to transform an unproductive shrubland into a Mediterranean dehesa.
    Tarrasón D; Ortiz O; Alcañiz JM
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Mar; 82(4):446-56. PubMed ID: 16549231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty analysis of penicillin V production using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Biwer A; Griffith S; Cooney C
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Apr; 90(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 15742389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies.
    Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Nopens I; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):67-78. PubMed ID: 17978434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ranking stormwater control strategies under uncertainty: the River Cam case study.
    Duchesne S; Beck MB; Reda AL
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):311-20. PubMed ID: 11385863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Model-based evaluation of nitrogen removal in a tannery wastewater treatment plant.
    Moussa MS; Rojas AR; Hooijmans CM; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):251-60. PubMed ID: 15537014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicriteria evaluation tools to support the conceptual design of activated sludge systems.
    Flores X; Bonmatí A; Poch M; Roda IR; Jiménez L; Bañares-Alcántara R
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):85-94. PubMed ID: 17898447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of plant-wide WWTP control strategies including the effects of filamentous bulking sludge.
    Flores-Alsina X; Comas J; Rodríguez Roda I; Poch M; Gernaey KV; Jeppsson U
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):2093-103. PubMed ID: 19844056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of multivariable statistical techniques in plant-wide WWTP control strategies analysis.
    Flores X; Comas J; Roda IR; Jiménez L; Gernaey KV
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):75-83. PubMed ID: 17898446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation.
    Rosen C; Jeppsson U; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):41-9. PubMed ID: 15685978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new approach towards modelling of the carbon degradation cycle at two-stage activated sludge plants.
    Winkler S; Müller-Rechberger H; Nowak O; Svardal K; Wandl G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):19-27. PubMed ID: 11385846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Climate change impacts on activated sludge wastewater treatment: a case study from Norway.
    Plósz BG; Liltved H; Ratnaweera H
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 19633397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantitative risk analysis tool for design/simulation of wastewater treatment plants.
    Bixio D; Parmentier G; Rousseau D; Verdonck F; Meirlaen J; Vanrolleghem PA; Thoeye C
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):301-7. PubMed ID: 12361025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systems approach evaluation of sludge management strategies: sludge management in Valparaíso and Aconcagua, Chile.
    Ramírez JJ; Frostell B; Galindo R
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):381-7. PubMed ID: 12361037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Renovation of the WWTP hove.
    Bixio D; Parmentier G; Boonen I; Thoeye C
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):103-10. PubMed ID: 15954569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.