780 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18804255)
1. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of control strategies using the benchmark simulation model No1 (BSM1).
Flores-Alsina X; Rodriguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(3):491-9. PubMed ID: 19214003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple-objective evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control alternatives.
Flores-Alsina X; Gallego A; Feijoo G; Rodriguez-Roda I
J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1193-201. PubMed ID: 20167418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater treatment plant model applications: prioritizing sources of uncertainty.
Sin G; Gernaey KV; Neumann MB; van Loosdrecht MC; Gujer W
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):639-51. PubMed ID: 20828785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: a critical discussion using an example from design.
Sin G; Gernaey KV; Neumann MB; van Loosdrecht MC; Gujer W
Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(11):2894-906. PubMed ID: 19447462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
Ekama GA
Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multi-criteria evaluation of organic amendments used to transform an unproductive shrubland into a Mediterranean dehesa.
Tarrasón D; Ortiz O; Alcañiz JM
J Environ Manage; 2007 Mar; 82(4):446-56. PubMed ID: 16549231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncertainty analysis of penicillin V production using Monte Carlo simulation.
Biwer A; Griffith S; Cooney C
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Apr; 90(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 15742389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies.
Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Nopens I; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):67-78. PubMed ID: 17978434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ranking stormwater control strategies under uncertainty: the River Cam case study.
Duchesne S; Beck MB; Reda AL
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):311-20. PubMed ID: 11385863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model-based evaluation of nitrogen removal in a tannery wastewater treatment plant.
Moussa MS; Rojas AR; Hooijmans CM; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):251-60. PubMed ID: 15537014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicriteria evaluation tools to support the conceptual design of activated sludge systems.
Flores X; Bonmatí A; Poch M; Roda IR; Jiménez L; Bañares-Alcántara R
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):85-94. PubMed ID: 17898447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of plant-wide WWTP control strategies including the effects of filamentous bulking sludge.
Flores-Alsina X; Comas J; Rodríguez Roda I; Poch M; Gernaey KV; Jeppsson U
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):2093-103. PubMed ID: 19844056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of multivariable statistical techniques in plant-wide WWTP control strategies analysis.
Flores X; Comas J; Roda IR; Jiménez L; Gernaey KV
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):75-83. PubMed ID: 17898446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation.
Rosen C; Jeppsson U; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):41-9. PubMed ID: 15685978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new approach towards modelling of the carbon degradation cycle at two-stage activated sludge plants.
Winkler S; Müller-Rechberger H; Nowak O; Svardal K; Wandl G
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):19-27. PubMed ID: 11385846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Climate change impacts on activated sludge wastewater treatment: a case study from Norway.
Plósz BG; Liltved H; Ratnaweera H
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 19633397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A quantitative risk analysis tool for design/simulation of wastewater treatment plants.
Bixio D; Parmentier G; Rousseau D; Verdonck F; Meirlaen J; Vanrolleghem PA; Thoeye C
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):301-7. PubMed ID: 12361025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A systems approach evaluation of sludge management strategies: sludge management in Valparaíso and Aconcagua, Chile.
Ramírez JJ; Frostell B; Galindo R
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):381-7. PubMed ID: 12361037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Renovation of the WWTP hove.
Bixio D; Parmentier G; Boonen I; Thoeye C
Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):103-10. PubMed ID: 15954569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]