1646 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18805059)
1. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.
Glassman S; Gornet MF; Branch C; Polly D; Peloza J; Schwender JD; Carreon L
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16413443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SF-6D values stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Canan CE; Burke LO; Glassman SD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E804-8. PubMed ID: 22228327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical outcomes in older patients after posterolateral lumbar fusion.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Dimar JR; Campbell MJ; Puno RM; Johnson JR
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 17905316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.
Copay AG; Martin MM; Subach BR; Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Schuler TC; Berven S
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 20171937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The long-term effect of posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a randomized controlled study.
Ekman P; Möller H; Hedlund R
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 15653083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The safety and efficacy of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) as a replacement for iliac crest autograft for posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis: minimum 4-year follow-up of a pilot study.
Vaccaro AR; Whang PG; Patel T; Phillips FM; Anderson DG; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Brower RS; Kurd MF; Appannagari A; Patel M; Fischgrund JS
Spine J; 2008; 8(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 17588821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do 1-year outcomes predict 2-year outcomes for adult deformity surgery?
Glassman SD; Schwab F; Bridwell KH; Shaffrey C; Horton W; Hu S
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 18774752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
Sears W
Spine J; 2005; 5(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 15749617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion.
Carragee EJ; Cheng I
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 20362247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Instrumented slip reduction and fusion for painful unstable isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.
Floman Y; Millgram MA; Ashkenazi E; Smorgick Y; Rand N
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Oct; 21(7):477-83. PubMed ID: 18836358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lytic spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
Sears W
Spine J; 2005; 5(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 15749616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of adjacent level disc degeneration on health status outcomes following lumbar fusion.
Throckmorton TW; Hilibrand AS; Mencio GA; Hodge A; Spengler DM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Nov; 28(22):2546-50. PubMed ID: 14624093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?
Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 20362248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
