These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18805528)

  • 21. Assessment of the accuracy of MRI wall shear stress estimation using numerical simulations.
    Petersson S; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul; 36(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 22336966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Carotid geometry effects on blood flow and on risk for vascular disease.
    Nguyen KT; Clark CD; Chancellor TJ; Papavassiliou DV
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 17919645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Volumetric arterial wall shear stress calculation based on cine phase contrast MRI.
    Potters WV; van Ooij P; Marquering H; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Feb; 41(2):505-16. PubMed ID: 24436246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of flip angle on volume flow measurement with nontriggered phase-contrast MR: In vivo evaluation in carotid and basilar arteries.
    Tanaka H; Fujita N; Takahashi H; Sakai M; Nagao T; Murase K; Nakamura H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 May; 29(5):1218-23. PubMed ID: 19388100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. V Flow technology in measurement of wall shear stress of common carotid arteries in healthy adults: Feasibility and normal values.
    Qiu Y; Yang D; Zhang Q; Chen K; Dong Y; Wang WP
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 74(4):453-462. PubMed ID: 31683473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of graft-host diameter ratio on the hemodynamics of CABG.
    Qiao A; Liu Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 16518018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Wall shear rates differ between the normal carotid, femoral, and brachial arteries: an in vivo MRI study.
    Wu SP; Ringgaard S; Oyre S; Hansen MS; Rasmus S; Pedersen EM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 14745752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in endothelial cells exposed to physiological coronary wall shear stresses.
    O'Keeffe LM; Muir G; Piterina AV; McGloughlin T
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Aug; 131(8):081003. PubMed ID: 19604015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Quantitative Analysis of Wall Shear Stress for Human Carotid Bifurcation at Cardiac Phases by the Use of Phase Contrast Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Computational Fluid Dynamics Study].
    Saho T; Onishi H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Dec; 71(12):1157-64. PubMed ID: 26685826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measurement of common carotid artery lumen dynamics during the cardiac cycle using magnetic resonance TrueFISP cine imaging.
    Chow TY; Cheung JS; Wu Y; Guo H; Chan KC; Hui ES; Wu EX
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1527-32. PubMed ID: 19025960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inlet conditions for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation: is it reasonable to assume fully developed flow?
    Moyle KR; Antiga L; Steinman DA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 16706586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Wall shear stress gradient analysis within an idealized stenosis using non-Newtonian flow.
    Schirmer CM; Malek AM
    Neurosurgery; 2007 Oct; 61(4):853-63; discussion 863-4. PubMed ID: 17986948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Aortic wall shear stress in Marfan syndrome.
    Geiger J; Arnold R; Herzer L; Hirtler D; Stankovic Z; Russe M; Langer M; Markl M
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Oct; 70(4):1137-44. PubMed ID: 23169240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hemodynamic parameters distribution of upstream, stenosis center, and downstream sides of plaques in carotid artery with different stenosis: a MRI and CFD study.
    Sui B; Gao P; Lin Y; Jing L; Sun S; Qin H
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reproducibility and interobserver variability of systolic blood flow velocity and 3D wall shear stress derived from 4D flow MRI in the healthy aorta.
    van Ooij P; Powell AL; Potters WV; Carr JC; Markl M; Barker AJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 43(1):236-48. PubMed ID: 26140480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping.
    Hope TA; Markl M; Wigström L; Alley MT; Miller DC; Herfkens RJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1471-9. PubMed ID: 17968892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Time-dependent flow velocity measurement using two-dimensional color Doppler flow imaging and evaluation by Hagen-Poiseuille equation.
    Zhang B; Sun Y; Xia L; Gu J
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Dec; 38(4):755-66. PubMed ID: 26676566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rheological effects of blood in a nonplanar distal end-to-side anastomosis.
    Wang QQ; Ping BH; Xu QB; Wang W
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051009. PubMed ID: 19045516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vivo wall shear stress distribution in the carotid artery: effect of bifurcation geometry, internal carotid artery stenosis, and recanalization therapy.
    Markl M; Wegent F; Zech T; Bauer S; Strecker C; Schumacher M; Weiller C; Hennig J; Harloff A
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Nov; 3(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 20847189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the relative importance of rheology for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation.
    Lee SW; Steinman DA
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 17408332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.