These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

648 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18805718)

  • 1. A comparative evaluation of immediate dental implant with autogenous versus synthetic guided bone regeneration.
    Hassan KS; Kassim A; Al Ogaly AU
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):e8-e15. PubMed ID: 18805718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Autogenous bone graft combined with polylactic polyglycolic acid polymer for treatment of dehiscence around immediate dental implants.
    Hassan KS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):e19-25. PubMed ID: 19836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a six-month prospective cohort study with surgical re-entry.
    Matarasso S; Salvi GE; Iorio Siciliano V; Cafiero C; Blasi A; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 19719737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective randomized clinical study of changes in soft tissue position following immediate and delayed implant placement.
    van Kesteren CJ; Schoolfield J; West J; Oates T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):562-70. PubMed ID: 20556256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immediate provisionalization of single extraction-site implants in the esthetic zone: a clinical evaluation.
    Valentini P; Abensur D; Albertini JF; Rocchesani M
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Feb; 30(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 20224830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year prospective clinical comparison of immediate replacement vs. immediate restoration of single tooth in the esthetic zone.
    Palattella P; Torsello F; Cordaro L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1148-53. PubMed ID: 18983318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interim endodontic therapy for alveolar socket bone regeneration of infected hopeless teeth prior to implant therapy.
    Rass MA
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 20218869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants in fresh-extraction sites at the maxillary esthetic zone: up to 6 years of follow-up.
    Mijiritsky E; Mardinger O; Mazor Z; Chaushu G
    Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 19667821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Success rate of immediate nonfunctional loaded single-tooth implants: immediate versus delayed implantation.
    Ribeiro FS; Pontes AE; Marcantonio E; Piattelli A; Neto RJ; Marcantonio E
    Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 18332764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial.
    Siciliano VI; Salvi GE; Matarasso S; Cafiero C; Blasi A; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 19281503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of guided bone regeneration and grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs.
    Kohal RJ; Mellas P; Hürzeler MB; Trejo PM; Morrison E; Caffesse RG
    J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 9736376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites.
    Chen ST; Buser D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24 Suppl():186-217. PubMed ID: 19885446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone formation following implantation of bone biomaterials into extraction sites.
    Molly L; Vandromme H; Quirynen M; Schepers E; Adams JL; van Steenberghe D
    J Periodontol; 2008 Jun; 79(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 18533791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes.
    Chen ST; Wilson TG; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19 Suppl():12-25. PubMed ID: 15635942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of sinus bone resorption and marginal bone loss after sinus bone grafting and implant placement.
    Kim YK; Yun PY; Kim SG; Kim BS; Ong JL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e21-8. PubMed ID: 19138634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified insertion technique for immediate implant placement into fresh extraction socket in the first maxillary molar sites: a 3-year prospective study.
    Acocella A; Bertolai R; Sacco R
    Implant Dent; 2010 Jun; 19(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 20523178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study.
    Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Giovanni GF; Chiara CS; Scotti R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 18700371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of stability changes for immediately placed dental implants.
    West JD; Oates TW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 17929524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone regeneration by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 around immediate implants: a pilot study in rats.
    Matin K; Senpuku H; Hanada N; Ozawa H; Ejiri S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 12705298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.