These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18805849)

  • 1. Improving quality of care in cardiac surgery: evaluating risk factors, processes of care, structures of care, and outcomes.
    Shroyer AL; McDonald GO; Wagner BD; Johnson R; Schade LM; Bell MR; Grover FL
    Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Sep; 12(3):140-52. PubMed ID: 18805849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) Ophthalmic Surgical Outcome Database (OSOD) project and the role of ophthalmic nurse reviewers.
    Lara-Smalling A; Cakiner-Egilmez T; Miller D; Redshirt E; Williams D
    Insight; 2011; 36(2):11-4. PubMed ID: 21717926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.
    Hall BL; Hamilton BH; Richards K; Bilimoria KY; Cohen ME; Ko CY
    Ann Surg; 2009 Sep; 250(3):363-76. PubMed ID: 19644350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship of processes and structures of care in general surgery to postoperative outcomes: a descriptive analysis.
    Main DS; Henderson WG; Pratte K; Cavender TA; Schifftner TL; Kinney A; Stoner T; Steiner JF; Fink AS; Khuri SF
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jun; 204(6):1157-65. PubMed ID: 17544074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in patient care, surgical education, research and faculty development.
    Longo WE; Cheadle W; Fink A; Kozol R; DePalma R; Rege R; Neumayer L; Tarpley J; Tarpley M; Joehl R; Miller TA; Rosendale D; Itani K
    Am J Surg; 2005 Nov; 190(5):662-75. PubMed ID: 16226937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.
    Khuri SF; Henderson WG; Daley J; Jonasson O; Jones RS; Campbell DA; Fink AS; Mentzer RM; Neumayer L; Hammermeister K; Mosca C; Healey N;
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 18650645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based outcome data after hernia surgery: a possible role for the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Fink AS
    Am J Surg; 2004 Dec; 188(6A Suppl):30S-34S. PubMed ID: 15610890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public release of clinical outcomes data—online CABG report cards.
    Ferris TG; Torchiana DF
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Oct; 363(17):1593-5. PubMed ID: 20961241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the reliability of data collected for the Department of Veterans Affairs national surgical quality improvement program.
    Davis CL; Pierce JR; Henderson W; Spencer CD; Tyler C; Langberg R; Swafford J; Felan GS; Kearns MA; Booker B
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Apr; 204(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17382213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fifteen years of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in review.
    Itani KM
    Am J Surg; 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S9-S18. PubMed ID: 19874939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk-adjusted outcomes and perioperative care.
    Napolitano LM; Bass BL
    Surg Clin North Am; 2005 Dec; 85(6):1341-6, xiv. PubMed ID: 16326214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship of processes and structures of care in general surgery to postoperative outcomes: a hierarchical analysis.
    Schifftner TL; Grunwald GK; Henderson WG; Main D; Khuri SF
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jun; 204(6):1166-77. PubMed ID: 17544075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The holy Grail of surgical quality Improvement: process measures or risk-adjusted outcomes?
    Rogers SO
    Am Surg; 2006 Nov; 72(11):1046-50; discussion 1061-9, 1133-48. PubMed ID: 17120947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the STS and multinational cardiac surgical databases to establish risk-adjusted benchmarks for clinical outcomes.
    Wyse RK; Taylor KM
    Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 12538142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A decade's experience with quality improvement in cardiac surgery using the Veterans Affairs and Society of Thoracic Surgeons national databases.
    Grover FL; Shroyer AL; Hammermeister K; Edwards FH; Ferguson TB; Dziuban SW; Cleveland JC; Clark RE; McDonald G
    Ann Surg; 2001 Oct; 234(4):464-72; discussion 472-4. PubMed ID: 11573040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Successful surgical benchmarking program moves to private sector.
    Perform Improv Advis; 2005 Jun; 9(6):67-9, 61. PubMed ID: 16097430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Establishing and using a local/regional cardiac surgery database.
    Arom KV; Petersen RJ; Orszulak TA; Bolman RM; Wickstrom PH; Joyce LD; Spooner TH; Tell BL; Janey PA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1997 Nov; 64(5):1245-9. PubMed ID: 9386686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjusted or unadjusted outcomes.
    Fink AS
    Am J Surg; 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S28-35. PubMed ID: 19874931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors associated with unanticipated day of surgery deaths in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals.
    Bishop MJ; Souders JE; Peterson CM; Henderson WG; Domino KB
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Dec; 107(6):1924-35. PubMed ID: 19020140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of quality of care for congenital heart disease.
    Welke KF; Jacobs JP; Jenkins KJ
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu; 2005; ():157-67. PubMed ID: 15818372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.