459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18806171)
1. Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography with unenhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses.
Quaia E; Bertolotto M; Cioffi V; Rossi A; Baratella E; Pizzolato R; Cov MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Oct; 191(4):1239-49. PubMed ID: 18806171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of benign from malignant focal splenic lesions using sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography.
Stang A; Keles H; Hentschke S; von Seydewitz CU; Dahlke J; Malzfeldt E; Braumann D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):709-21. PubMed ID: 19696284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multislice computed tomography versus contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of complex cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification system.
Clevert DA; Minaifar N; Weckbach S; Jung EM; Stock K; Reiser M; Staehler M
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2008; 39(1-4):171-8. PubMed ID: 18503122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography and MRI in displaying anatomic features of cystic pancreatic masses.
D'Onofrio M; Megibow AJ; Faccioli N; Malagò R; Capelli P; Falconi M; Mucelli RP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1435-42. PubMed ID: 18029882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Renal Masses With Equivocal Enhancement at CT: Characterization With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Bertolotto M; Cicero C; Perrone R; Degrassi F; Cacciato F; Cova MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):W557-65. PubMed ID: 25905962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of atypical cystic renal masses with MDCT: comparison of 5-mm axial images and thin multiplanar reconstructed images.
Bertolotto M; Zappetti R; Cavallaro M; Perrone R; Perretti L; Cova MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):693-700. PubMed ID: 20729448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of cystic renal masses based on Bosniak classification: comparison of CT and contrast-enhanced US.
Park BK; Kim B; Kim SH; Ko K; Lee HM; Choi HY
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 17097844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of cystic renal masses in children: comparison of multislice computed tomography and ultrasound imaging using the Bosniak classification system.
Peng Y; Jia L; Sun N; Li J; Fu L; Zeng J; Chen F; Ma D
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Sep; 75(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 20594787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attenuation and Degree of Enhancement With Conventional 120-kVp Polychromatic CT and 70-keV Monochromatic Rapid Kilovoltage-Switching Dual-Energy CT in Cystic and Solid Renal Masses.
Krishna S; Sadoughi N; McInnes MDF; Chatelain R; MacDonald DB; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):789-796. PubMed ID: 30106611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of cystic renal mass: in comparison to contrast-enhanced CT and conventional ultrasound.
Xue LY; Lu Q; Huang BJ; Ma JJ; Yan LX; Wen JX; Wang WP
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Dec; 39(6):1274-83. PubMed ID: 24929667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast enhanced ultrasonography prediction of cystic renal mass in comparison to histopathology.
Xu Y; Zhang S; Wei X; Pan Y; Hao J
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2014; 58(3):429-38. PubMed ID: 24165574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography for the differentiation of cystic renal lesions: preliminary study.
Kim AY; Kim SH; Kim YJ; Lee IH
J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Sep; 18(9):581-8. PubMed ID: 10478966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bosniak classification system: inter-observer and intra-observer agreement among experienced uroradiologists.
Graumann O; Osther SS; Karstoft J; Hørlyck A; Osther PJ
Acta Radiol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):374-83. PubMed ID: 24682404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective evaluation of ultrasound-indeterminate renal multilocular cystic masses by using neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and computed tomography.
Wang H; Gu L; Jia R; Zeng J; Liu X; Zhang D; Wu Y; Luo G; Zhang X
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):35.e7-35.e14. PubMed ID: 27671994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing component on CT to predict malignancy in cystic renal masses and interobserver agreement of different CT features.
Benjaminov O; Atri M; O'Malley M; Lobo K; Tomlinson G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):665-72. PubMed ID: 16498093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can high-attenuation renal cysts be differentiated from renal cell carcinoma at unenhanced CT?
Jonisch AI; Rubinowitz AN; Mutalik PG; Israel GM
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):445-50. PubMed ID: 17456870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bosniak category IIF and III cystic renal lesions: outcomes and associations.
Smith AD; Remer EM; Cox KL; Lieber ML; Allen BC; Shah SN; Herts BR
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 22106359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Small (< or = 3 cm) renal masses: correlation of spiral CT features and pathologic findings.
Silverman SG; Lee BY; Seltzer SE; Bloom DA; Corless CL; Adams DF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):597-605. PubMed ID: 8079852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distinction of renal cell carcinomas from high-attenuation renal cysts at portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT.
Suh M; Coakley FV; Qayyum A; Yeh BM; Breiman RS; Lu Y
Radiology; 2003 Aug; 228(2):330-4. PubMed ID: 12819331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced sonography of adrenal masses: differentiation of adenomas and nonadenomatous lesions.
Friedrich-Rust M; Schneider G; Bohle RM; Herrmann E; Sarrazin C; Zeuzem S; Bojunga J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):1852-60. PubMed ID: 19020259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
