These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18806195)
1. Measuring and valuing mental health for use in economic evaluation. Brazier J J Health Serv Res Policy; 2008 Oct; 13 Suppl 3():70-5. PubMed ID: 18806195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures. Brazier J; Connell J; Papaioannou D; Mukuria C; Mulhern B; Peasgood T; Jones ML; Paisley S; O'Cathain A; Barkham M; Knapp M; Byford S; Gilbody S; Parry G Health Technol Assess; 2014 May; 18(34):vii-viii, xiii-xxv, 1-188. PubMed ID: 24857402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing and testing methods for deriving preference-based measures of health from condition-specific measures (and other patient-based measures of outcome). Brazier JE; Rowen D; Mavranezouli I; Tsuchiya A; Young T; Yang Y; Barkham M; Ibbotson R Health Technol Assess; 2012 Jul; 16(32):1-114. PubMed ID: 22832015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating a Preference-Based Index for Mental Health From the Recovering Quality of Life Measure: Valuation of Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index. Keetharuth AD; Rowen D; Bjorner JB; Brazier J Value Health; 2021 Feb; 24(2):281-290. PubMed ID: 33518035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The DEP-6D, a new preference-based measure to assess health states of dependency. Rodríguez-Míguez E; Abellán-Perpiñán JM; Alvarez XC; González XM; Sampayo AR Soc Sci Med; 2016 Mar; 153():210-9. PubMed ID: 26921836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-6D from a measure of common mental health problems (CORE-OM). Mavranezouli I; Brazier JE; Young TA; Barkham M Qual Life Res; 2011 Apr; 20(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 20972629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey. Longworth L; Yang Y; Young T; Mulhern B; Hernández Alava M; Mukuria C; Rowen D; Tosh J; Tsuchiya A; Evans P; Devianee Keetharuth A; Brazier J Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(9):1-224. PubMed ID: 24524660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Losing sight of the wood for the trees: some issues in describing and valuing health, and another possible approach. Dolan P; Lee H; Peasgood T Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Nov; 30(11):1035-49. PubMed ID: 22974537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Putting the 'Q' in depression QALYs: a comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D health related quality of life measures. Mann R; Gilbody S; Richards D Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):569-78. PubMed ID: 19011721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Developing a New Version of the SF-6D Health State Classification System From the SF-36v2: SF-6Dv2. Brazier JE; Mulhern BJ; Bjorner JB; Gandek B; Rowen D; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Ware JE; Med Care; 2020 Jun; 58(6):557-565. PubMed ID: 32412942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Valuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment. Norman R; Viney R; Brazier J; Burgess L; Cronin P; King M; Ratcliffe J; Street D Med Decis Making; 2014 Aug; 34(6):773-86. PubMed ID: 24025661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using generic preference-based measures in mental health: psychometric validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D. Mulhern B; Mukuria C; Barkham M; Knapp M; Byford S; Soeteman D; Brazier J Br J Psychiatry; 2014 Sep; 205(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 24855127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D. Ratcliffe J; Flynn T; Terlich F; Stevens K; Brazier J; Sawyer M Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Aug; 30(8):713-27. PubMed ID: 22788261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Valuing the SF-6Dv2 Classification System in the United Kingdom Using a Discrete-choice Experiment With Duration. Mulhern BJ; Bansback N; Norman R; Brazier J; Med Care; 2020 Jun; 58(6):566-573. PubMed ID: 32221100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation: are QALYs contraindicated? Ungar WJ Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Aug; 29(8):641-52. PubMed ID: 21604821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Portuguese value set for the SF-6D. Ferreira LN; Ferreira PL; Pereira LN; Brazier J; Rowen D Value Health; 2010 Aug; 13(5):624-30. PubMed ID: 20230545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient and public preferences for health states associated with AMD. Butt T; Dunbar HM; Morris S; Orr S; Rubin GS Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Aug; 90(8):855-60. PubMed ID: 23811607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unchained melody: revisiting the estimation of SF-6D values. Craig BM Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Sep; 17(7):865-73. PubMed ID: 26359242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What Difference Does It Make? A Comparison of Health State Preferences Elicited From the General Population and From People With Multiple Sclerosis. Goodwin E; Green C; Hawton A Value Health; 2020 Feb; 23(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 32113630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]