These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
602 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18806624)
1. Comparison of aortic pulse wave velocity measured by three techniques: Complior, SphygmoCor and Arteriograph. Rajzer MW; Wojciechowska W; Klocek M; Palka I; Brzozowska-Kiszka M; Kawecka-Jaszcz K J Hypertens; 2008 Oct; 26(10):2001-7. PubMed ID: 18806624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two instruments measuring carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: Vicorder versus SphygmoCor. van Leeuwen-Segarceanu EM; Tromp WF; Bos WJ; Vogels OJ; Groothoff JW; van der Lee JH J Hypertens; 2010 Aug; 28(8):1687-91. PubMed ID: 20498619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noninvasive determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity depends critically on assessment of travel distance: a comparison with invasive measurement. Weber T; Ammer M; Rammer M; Adji A; O'Rourke MF; Wassertheurer S; Rosenkranz S; Eber B J Hypertens; 2009 Aug; 27(8):1624-30. PubMed ID: 19531964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new oscillometric method for assessment of arterial stiffness: comparison with tonometric and piezo-electronic methods. Baulmann J; Schillings U; Rickert S; Uen S; Düsing R; Illyes M; Cziraki A; Nickering G; Mengden T J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 26(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 18300864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparability and reproducibility of the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measurements using a multi-element carotid tonometry sensor. Ueda I; Tagawa T; Watanabe S; Yamakawa K; Yasu T; Ueda S J Hum Hypertens; 2008 Oct; 22(10):699-703. PubMed ID: 18528407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the effects of physiological release of melatonin on arterial distensibility and blood pressure. Yildiz M; Akdemir O Cardiol Young; 2009 Apr; 19(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 19267945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of methodologies for pulse wave velocity estimation. Salvi P; Magnani E; Valbusa F; Agnoletti D; Alecu C; Joly L; Benetos A J Hum Hypertens; 2008 Oct; 22(10):669-77. PubMed ID: 18528411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of arterial stiffness in hypertension: comparison of oscillometric (Arteriograph), piezoelectronic (Complior) and tonometric (SphygmoCor) techniques. Jatoi NA; Mahmud A; Bennett K; Feely J J Hypertens; 2009 Nov; 27(11):2186-91. PubMed ID: 19834344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Complior Analyse device with Sphygmocor and Complior SP for pulse wave velocity and central pressure assessment. Stea F; Bozec E; Millasseau S; Khettab H; Boutouyrie P; Laurent S J Hypertens; 2014 Apr; 32(4):873-80. PubMed ID: 24509122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased pulse wave velocity and blood pressure in children who have undergone cardiac transplantation. Klinge A; Allen J; Murray A; O'Sullivan J J Heart Lung Transplant; 2009 Jan; 28(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19134526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased pulse wave velocity and shortened pulse wave propagation time in young patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Yildiz M; Soy M; Kurum T; Ozbay G Can J Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 20(11):1097-100. PubMed ID: 15457305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A magnetic resonance perspective of the pulse wave transit time by the Arteriograph device and potential for improving aortic length estimation for central pulse wave velocity. Rezai MR; Cowan BR; Sherratt N; Finn JD; Wu FC; Cruickshank JK Blood Press Monit; 2013 Apr; 18(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 23324879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pulse wave velocity. A new calculation method. Mosti G; Iabichella ML; Picerni P Minerva Cardioangiol; 2000 Mar; 48(3):53-9. PubMed ID: 10838834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aldosterone-to-renin ratio, arterial stiffness, and the response to aldosterone antagonism in essential hypertension. Mahmud A; Feely J Am J Hypertens; 2005 Jan; 18(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 15691617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between aortic augmentation index and pulse wave velocity: an invasive study. Sakurai M; Yamakado T; Kurachi H; Kato T; Kuroda K; Ishisu R; Okamoto S; Isaka N; Nakano T; Ito M J Hypertens; 2007 Feb; 25(2):391-7. PubMed ID: 17211246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age and gender related patterns in carotid-femoral PWV and carotid and femoral stiffness in a large healthy, middle-aged population. Vermeersch SJ; Rietzschel ER; De Buyzere ML; De Bacquer D; De Backer G; Van Bortel LM; Gillebert TC; Verdonck PR; Segers P J Hypertens; 2008 Jul; 26(7):1411-9. PubMed ID: 18551018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beta-blockers reduce aortic stiffness in hypertension but nebivolol, not atenolol, reduces wave reflection. Mahmud A; Feely J Am J Hypertens; 2008 Jun; 21(6):663-7. PubMed ID: 18437130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Vicorder device compared with SphygmoCor in the assessment of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Shahin Y; Barakat H; Barnes R; Chetter I Hypertens Res; 2013 Mar; 36(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 23034469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of two generations of the Complior device for aortic pulse wave velocity measurements. Pereira T; Maldonado J Blood Press Monit; 2010 Dec; 15(6):316-21. PubMed ID: 20838328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity: a comparison of real travelled aortic path lengths determined by MRI and superficial measurements. Huybrechts SA; Devos DG; Vermeersch SJ; Mahieu D; Achten E; de Backer TL; Segers P; van Bortel LM J Hypertens; 2011 Aug; 29(8):1577-82. PubMed ID: 21666491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]