These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1880698)

  • 1. The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology.
    Chaplin WF
    J Pers; 1991 Jun; 59(2):143-78. PubMed ID: 1880698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Personality coherence: moderating self--other profile agreement and profile consensus.
    Biesanz JC; West SG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Sep; 79(3):425-37. PubMed ID: 10981844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bridging the idiographic-nomothetic divide in ratings of self and others on the Big Five.
    Grice JW
    J Pers; 2004 Apr; 72(2):203-41. PubMed ID: 15016064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metatraits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior.
    Hirsh JB; Deyoung CG; Peterson JB
    J Pers; 2009 Aug; 77(4):1085-102. PubMed ID: 19558442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External validity of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) in a clinical sample.
    Slavin-Mulford J; Sinclair SJ; Stein M; Malone J; Bello I; Blais MA
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(6):593-600. PubMed ID: 22571412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].
    Massoubre C; Bonnefond H; Grosselin A; Nelva A; Pellet J; Lang F
    Encephale; 2009 Dec; 35(6):544-53. PubMed ID: 20004285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.
    Soto CJ; John OP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Jul; 113(1):117-143. PubMed ID: 27055049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A framework for profile similarity: integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness.
    Furr RM
    J Pers; 2008 Oct; 76(5):1267-316. PubMed ID: 18705644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personality and health: advantages and limitations of the five-factor model.
    Smith TW; Williams PG
    J Pers; 1992 Jun; 60(2):395-423. PubMed ID: 1635048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of informant ratings and spouse similarity based on the Temperament and Character Inventory.
    Brändstrjöm S; Przybeck TR; Sigvardsson S
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):231-42. PubMed ID: 22049664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Socially desirable responding and its elusive effects on the validity of personality assessments.
    Paunonen SV; LeBel EP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):158-75. PubMed ID: 22564012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal populations.
    Lilienfeld SO; Andrews BP
    J Pers Assess; 1996 Jun; 66(3):488-524. PubMed ID: 8667144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of dependency, agreeableness, and their relationship.
    Lowe JR; Edmundson M; Widiger TA
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Dec; 21(4):543-53. PubMed ID: 19947788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
    Baron RM; Kenny DA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1986 Dec; 51(6):1173-82. PubMed ID: 3806354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-taker and close-other selection of personality inventory feedback.
    Word S
    J Pers Assess; 1996 Apr; 66(2):402-13. PubMed ID: 8869580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personality and psychopathology: an application of the five-factor model.
    Widiger TA; Trull TJ
    J Pers; 1992 Jun; 60(2):363-93. PubMed ID: 1635047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The rating and self-rating of anxiety.
    Kellner R; Uhlenhuth EH
    Br J Psychiatry Suppl; 1991 Sep; (12):15-22. PubMed ID: 1840759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model.
    Maples JL; Guan L; Carter NT; Miller JD
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1070-84. PubMed ID: 24932643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Psychometric evaluation of obsessive compulsive disorder. Recent diagnostic scales].
    Buisson G; Hantouche E; Baddoura C; Guelfi JD
    Encephale; 1989; 15(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 8641164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the validity of the five-factor model (FFM) personality disorder prototypes. Using FFM self-report and interview measures.
    Miller JD; Bagby RM; Pilkonis PA
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Dec; 17(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 16393018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.