These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18807449)
1. Preparation design and considerations for direct posterior composite inlay/onlay restoration. Fligor J Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 20(7):413-9; quiz 420, 432. PubMed ID: 18807449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ceramic inlays: a case presentation and lessons learned from the literature. Boushell LW; Ritter AV J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19368595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations. Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series. Otto T; Schneider D Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term survivals of 'direct-wax' cast gold onlays: a retrospective study in a general dental practice. Bandlish LK; Mariatos G Br Dent J; 2009 Aug; 207(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 19662053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays. Posselt A; Kerschbaum T Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jul; 6(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 14601187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Frankenberger R; Reinelt C; Petschelt A; Krämer N Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical considerations for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/onlay restorations: a review. Terry DA; Touati B Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001; 13(1):51-8; quiz 60. PubMed ID: 11301531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biologic restoration: the effects of composite inlays on patient treatment plans. Bottacchiari S; De Paoli S; Bottacchiari PA Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011 Apr; 31(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 21491010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study. Shannon A Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays. Estafan D; Dussetschleger F; Agosta C; Reich S Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictability and aesthetics with nonmetal onlays. Ruiz JL; Nelson C; Bazan R Dent Today; 2007 Apr; 26(4):106, 108, 110. PubMed ID: 17486785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of cast gold restorations: scientific basis and clinical technique. Small B Dent Today; 2000 Nov; 19(11):42-9. PubMed ID: 12524778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A simple, practical method for optimizing aesthetic results of CEREC milled restorations. Karkar IG Dent Today; 2001 Jul; 20(7):106-11. PubMed ID: 11462333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictable aesthetic replacement of a metal-ceramic crown using CAD/CAM technology: a case report. Poticny D; Conrad R Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 17(7):491-6. PubMed ID: 18655339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]