These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18807495)

  • 1. [Classification bias in epidemiological studies].
    Zieliński A
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2008; 62(2):461-70. PubMed ID: 18807495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implications of nondifferential misclassification on estimates of attributable risk.
    Vogel C; Gefeller O
    Methods Inf Med; 2002; 41(4):342-8. PubMed ID: 12425247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Information bias in epidemiological studies with a special focus on obstetrics and gynecology.
    Kesmodel US
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):417-423. PubMed ID: 29453880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exposure measurement error: influence on exposure-disease. Relationships and methods of correction.
    Thomas D; Stram D; Dwyer J
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1993; 14():69-93. PubMed ID: 8323607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Bias in observational research: 'confounding'].
    Groenwold RH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(13):A4221. PubMed ID: 22456291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accounting for independent nondifferential misclassification does not increase certainty that an observed association is in the correct direction.
    Greenland S; Gustafson P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 164(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 16641307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy Part 2. Principles of causality in epidemiological research: confounding, effect modification and strength of association.
    Shapiro S
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2008 Jul; 34(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 18577320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of misclassification on the estimation of association: a review.
    Höfler M
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2005; 14(2):92-101. PubMed ID: 16175878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.
    Little RJ; Rubin DB
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2000; 21():121-45. PubMed ID: 10884949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Study on the impact of exposure misclassification on the validity of a study].
    Zhou YB; Yang MX; Jiang QW
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 26(11):919-23. PubMed ID: 16676619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fixed effects analysis of repeated measures data.
    Gunasekara FI; Richardson K; Carter K; Blakely T
    Int J Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 43(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 24366487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias due to non-differential misclassification of polytomous confounders.
    Brenner H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Jan; 46(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 8433115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias in clinical epidemiological study designs.
    Rivas-Ruiz F; Pérez-Vicente S; González-Ramírez AR
    Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 2013; 41(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 23036443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to assess epidemiological studies.
    Zaccai JH
    Postgrad Med J; 2004 Mar; 80(941):140-7. PubMed ID: 15016934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].
    Touzet S; Colin C
    Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias magnification in ecologic studies: a methodological investigation.
    Webster TF
    Environ Health; 2007 Jul; 6():17. PubMed ID: 17615079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures.
    Blair A; Stewart P; Lubin JH; Forastiere F
    Am J Ind Med; 2007 Mar; 50(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 17096363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accounting for response misclassification and covariate measurement error improves power and reduces bias in epidemiologic studies.
    Cheng D; Branscum AJ; Stamey JD
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):562-7. PubMed ID: 20538200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The impact of incorrectly-measured variables when mixed with precisely measured variables on the study of validity in epidemiological research].
    Yang MX; Zhou YB; Jiang QW
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 28(8):810-3. PubMed ID: 18080573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How far from non-differential does exposure or disease misclassification have to be to bias measures of association away from the null?
    Jurek AM; Greenland S; Maldonado G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 37(2):382-5. PubMed ID: 18184671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.