575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18807557)
1. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of macro-design of immediately loaded implants on micromotion and stress distribution in surrounding bone using finite element analysis.
Fazel A; Aalai S; Rismanchian M
Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 19667823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical optimization of implant diameter and length for immediate loading: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
Kong L; Gu Z; Li T; Wu J; Hu K; Liu Y; Zhou H; Liu B
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 19918598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of off-axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Hsu ML; Chen FC; Kao HC; Cheng CK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17465356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical study of a prosthetic solution based on an angled abutment: case of upper lateral incisor.
Dubois G; Daas M; Bonnet AS; Lipinski P
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):989-98. PubMed ID: 17158084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stress analysis in simulation models with or without implant threads representation.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; de Sousa EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1040-4. PubMed ID: 20162107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface.
Canay S; Akça K
Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19509534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
