476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18807557)
21. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method.
Lin CL; Chang SH; Chang WJ; Kuo YC
Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Oct; 115(5):408-16. PubMed ID: 17850430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of implant connection type on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants - CT-based nonlinear, three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Pessoa RS; Muraru L; Júnior EM; Vaz LG; Sloten JV; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):219-34. PubMed ID: 19438946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study.
Saab XE; Griggs JA; Powers JM; Engelmeier RL
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Feb; 97(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 17341376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis.
Rubo JH; Capello Souza EA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 19220846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nonlinear finite element analysis versus ex vivo strain gauge measurements on immediately loaded implants.
Eser A; Akça K; Eckert S; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 19587865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Alveolar bone stress around implants with different abutment angulation: an FE-analysis of anterior maxilla.
Sadrimanesh R; Siadat H; Sadr-Eshkevari P; Monzavi A; Maurer P; Rashad A
Implant Dent; 2012 Jun; 21(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22513498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of implant number and abutment design on the biomechanical behaviour of bone for an implant-supported fixed prosthesis: a finite element study in the upper anterior region.
Hasan I; Bourauel C; Keilig L; Reimann S; Heinemann F
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Dec; 14(12):1113-6. PubMed ID: 20924861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Micromotion and stress distribution of immediate loaded implants: a finite element analysis.
Fazel A; Aalai S; Rismanchian M; Sadr-Eshkevari P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 18783413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
