476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18807557)
41. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.
Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An investigation of tooth/implant-supported fixed prosthesis designs with two different stress analysis methods: an in vitro study.
Ozçelik T; Ersoy AE
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 17362420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effects of cortical bone thickness and implant length on bone strain and interfacial micromotion in an immediately loaded implant.
Tu MG; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Lin DJ; Huang HL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 20657865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of the influence of location of osseointegrated implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures.
Cunha LD; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Pereira JA
Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 18784528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study.
Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Giovanni GF; Chiara CS; Scotti R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 18700371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; El-Maaytah M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Impact of dental and zygomatic implants on stress distribution in maxillary defects: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Korkmaz FM; Korkmaz YT; Yaluğ S; Korkmaz T
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 20925533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The influence of abutment angulation on screw loosening of implants in the anterior maxilla.
Ha CY; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Choi JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 21365037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Peri-implant bone reactions at delayed and immediately loaded implants: an experimental study.
Kim SH; Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F; Lee SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17764984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Immediate functional loading of TiOblast dental implants in full-arch edentulous maxillae: a 3-year prospective study.
Collaert B; De Bruyn H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1254-60. PubMed ID: 19040440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations.
Rodríguez-Ciurana X; Vela-Nebot X; Segalà-Torres M; Rodado-Alonso C; Méndez-Blanco V; Mata-Bugueroles M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Oct; 29(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 19888491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Implant platform switching: biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Adelino Ricardo Barão V; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):182-7. PubMed ID: 20098182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effect of model parameters on finite element analysis of micromotions in implant dentistry.
Winter W; Klein D; Karl M
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Feb; 39(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23402356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
