These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

576 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18807557)

  • 61. Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations.
    Rodríguez-Ciurana X; Vela-Nebot X; Segalà-Torres M; Rodado-Alonso C; Méndez-Blanco V; Mata-Bugueroles M
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Oct; 29(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 19888491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
    Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface.
    Gratton DG; Aquilino SA; Stanford CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11174678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
    Hecker DM; Eckert SE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Implant platform switching: biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Adelino Ricardo Barão V; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):182-7. PubMed ID: 20098182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Finite element analysis of ceramic abutment-restoration combinations for osseointegrated implants.
    Papavasiliou G; Tripodakis AP; Kamposiora P; Strub JR; Bayne SC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 8957860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparison of load transfer by angulated, standard and inclined implant abutments.
    Tuncelli B; Poyrazoglu E; Köylüoglu AM; Tezcan S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1997 Jun; 5(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 9487817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection.
    Merz BR; Hunenbart S; Belser UC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):519-26. PubMed ID: 10960985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Effect of model parameters on finite element analysis of micromotions in implant dentistry.
    Winter W; Klein D; Karl M
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Feb; 39(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23402356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
    Lin CL; Wang JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Angled abutments result in increased or decreased stress on surrounding bone of single-unit dental implants: a finite element analysis.
    Tian K; Chen J; Han L; Yang J; Huang W; Wu D
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Dec; 34(10):1526-31. PubMed ID: 23122601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A further finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla.
    Wu D; Tian K; Chen J; Jin H; Huang W; Liu Y
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():560645. PubMed ID: 25802549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Finite element analysis of stress in bone adjacent to dental implants.
    Rubo JH; Souza EA
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(5):248-55. PubMed ID: 19170290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Effect of superstructure materials and misfit on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: a finite element analysis.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Delben JA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 20485030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Selection of optimal dental implant diameter and length in type IV bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Li T; Kong L; Wang Y; Hu K; Song L; Liu B; Li D; Shao J; Ding Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 38(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 19656657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.