904 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18807559)
21. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Surface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits.
Rocchietta I; Fontana F; Addis A; Schupbach P; Simion M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Aug; 20(8):844-50. PubMed ID: 19604281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants.
Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
Fawzy AS; Amer MA
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages.
Choi JW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lim YJ; Kim SH; Lee JB
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 17168931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
Jung YC; Han CH; Lee IS; Kim HE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):809-18. PubMed ID: 11769831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of alendronate on endosseous implant integration: an in vivo study in rabbits.
Chacon GE; Stine EA; Larsen PE; Beck FM; McGlumphy EA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1005-9. PubMed ID: 16781331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs.
Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Albouy JP; Lindhe J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17269959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Nano hydroxyapatite structures influence early bone formation.
Meirelles L; Arvidsson A; Andersson M; Kjellin P; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Nov; 87(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 18181110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of implant surface properties on peri-implant bone healing: a histological and histomorphometric study in dogs.
Al-Hamdan K; Al-Moaber SH; Junker R; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 21561482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Buser D; Nydegger T; Hirt HP; Cochran DL; Nolte LP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 9796144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Enhanced implant integration with hierarchically structured implants: a pilot study in rabbits.
Johansson CB; Gretzer C; Jimbo R; Mattisson I; Ahlberg E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):943-53. PubMed ID: 21722190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bone response to a pure titanium implant surface modified by laser etching and microarc oxidation.
Guo Z; Zhou L; Rong M; Zhu A; Geng H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 20209195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluations of bone tissue integration to pure and alloyed titanium implants.
Stenport VF; Johansson CB
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Sep; 10(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 18241219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nanostructured alumina-coated implant surface: effect on osteoblast-related gene expression and bone-to-implant contact in vivo.
Mendonça G; Mendonça DB; Simões LG; Araújo AL; Leite ER; Duarte WR; Cooper LF; Aragão FJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 19492635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T
Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
