194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18807560)
1. Strain development in 3-unit implant-supported CAD/CAM restorations.
Karl M; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM; Krafft T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):648-52. PubMed ID: 18807560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.
Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture.
Karl M; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):739-45. PubMed ID: 21841982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strain development of implant-supported fixed prostheses copy milled from zirconia ceramic.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):479-81. PubMed ID: 21909492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic-veneered superstructures.
Karl M; Rosch S; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15798682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations.
Karl M; Holst S
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 22371839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 15248882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures.
Karl M; Winter W; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 14982352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo stress behavior in cemented and screw-retained five-unit implant FPDs.
Karl M; Taylor TD; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16433647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structural changes in ceramic veneered three-unit implant-supported restorations as a consequence of static and dynamic loading.
Karl M; Fischer H; Graef F; Wichmann MG; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 17669484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems.
Reich S; Wichmann M; Nkenke E; Proeschel P
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Apr; 113(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 15819826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system.
Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Spiekermann H; Anusavice KJ
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 11504436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fixation of 5-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures and resulting bone loading: a finite element assessment based on in vivo strain measurements.
Karl M; Winter W; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):756-62. PubMed ID: 17066637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-year prospective follow-up of implant/tooth-supported versus freestanding implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Dec; 28(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 19146055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation: a finite-element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements.
Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16672032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region.
Tsumita M; Kokubo Y; Vult von Steyern P; Fukushima S
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 18205740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal fit of implant-supported all-ceramic zirconia frameworks.
Zaghloul HH; Younis JF
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Aug; 39(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 23964776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro strain gauge analysis of axial and off-axial loading on implant supported fixed partial dentures.
Cehreli MC; Iplikçioglu H
Implant Dent; 2002; 11(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 12271568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
