These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
608 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18807566)
1. The zirconia implant-bone interface: a preliminary histologic evaluation in rabbits. Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Gallez F; Jung RE; Weber FE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 18807566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits. Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: an experiment in the rat. Kohal RJ; Wolkewitz M; Hinze M; Han JS; Bächle M; Butz F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 19298287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osseointegration of one-piece zirconia implants compared with a titanium implant of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog. Koch FP; Weng D; Krämer S; Biesterfeld S; Jahn-Eimermacher A; Wagner W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 20074240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of zirconia and titanium implants after a short healing period. A pilot study in minipigs. Stadlinger B; Hennig M; Eckelt U; Kuhlisch E; Mai R Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 39(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 20172693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of surface nano-roughness on osseointegration of zirconia implants in rabbit femur heads using selective infiltration etching technique. Aboushelib MN; Salem NA; Taleb AL; El Moniem NM J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):583-90. PubMed ID: 21905894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants: a study in rabbits. Lee J; Sieweke JH; Rodriguez NA; Schüpbach P; Lindström H; Susin C; Wikesjö UM J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Jul; 36(7):610-7. PubMed ID: 19538335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Collagen fiber orientation around machined titanium and zirconia dental implant necks: an animal study. Tetè S; Mastrangelo F; Bianchi A; Zizzari V; Scarano A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19344025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trabecular bone response to titanium implants with a thin carbonate-containing apatite coating applied using the molecular precursor method. Hayakawa T; Takahashi K; Yoshinari M; Okada H; Yamamoto H; Sato M; Nemoto K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):851-8. PubMed ID: 17190294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone response to zirconia ceramic implants: an experimental study in rabbits. Scarano A; Di Carlo F; Quaranta M; Piattelli A J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 12614079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits. Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur. Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants: a histological and histomorphometrical study in the maxilla of pigs. Gahlert M; Röhling S; Wieland M; Sprecher CM; Kniha H; Milz S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1247-53. PubMed ID: 19531104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Zirconia dental implants: a literature review. Özkurt Z; Kazazoğlu E J Oral Implantol; 2011 Jun; 37(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 20545529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants. Salem NA; Abo Taleb AL; Aboushelib MN J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23107438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment. Kohal RJ; Weng D; Bächle M; Strub JR J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1262-8. PubMed ID: 15515343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur. Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]