These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18808259)

  • 1. The moderator effect that wasn't there: statistical problems in ambivalence research.
    Ullrich J; Schermelleh-Engel K; Böttcher B
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Oct; 95(4):774-94. PubMed ID: 18808259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power calculations for survival analyses via Monte Carlo estimation.
    Richardson DB
    Am J Ind Med; 2003 Nov; 44(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 14571517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power equivalence in structural equation modelling.
    von Oertzen T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):257-72. PubMed ID: 19527562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30-year review.
    Aguinis H; Beaty JC; Boik RJ; Pierce CA
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jan; 90(1):94-107. PubMed ID: 15641892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization.
    DeCoster J; Iselin AM; Gallucci M
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Dec; 14(4):349-66. PubMed ID: 19968397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using effect sizes for research reporting: examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioning.
    Steinberg L; Thissen D
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 17154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: potential problems and promising opportunities.
    Bauer DJ; Curran PJ
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 15053717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis.
    Hedges LV; Pigott TD
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Dec; 9(4):426-45. PubMed ID: 15598097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations.
    Hittner JB; May K; Silver NC
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 12773018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining the statistical significance of relative weights.
    Tonidandel S; Lebreton JM; Johnson JW
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Dec; 14(4):387-99. PubMed ID: 19968399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An overall statistic for testing symmetry in social interactions.
    Leiva D; Solanas A; Salafranca L
    Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):951-7. PubMed ID: 18940109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the power of multivariate latent growth curve models to detect correlated change.
    Hertzog C; Lindenberger U; Ghisletta P; Oertzen Tv
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 16953703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When effect sizes disagree: the case of r and d.
    McGrath RE; Meyer GJ
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):386-401. PubMed ID: 17154753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bootstrap scree tests: a Monte Carlo simulation and applications to published data.
    Hong S; Mitchell SK; Harshman RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):35-57. PubMed ID: 16709278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A general approach for sample size and power calculations based on the Haseman-Elston method.
    Hädicke O; Pahlke F; Ziegler A
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 18383449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planned missing data designs in psychological research.
    Graham JW; Taylor BJ; Olchowski AE; Cumsille PE
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):323-43. PubMed ID: 17154750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: different models for different types of methods.
    Eid M; Nussbeck FW; Geiser C; Cole DA; Gollwitzer M; Lischetzke T
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):230-53. PubMed ID: 18778153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: an exploration of the PAST model.
    Petty RE; Tormala ZL; Briñol P; Jarvis WB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):21-41. PubMed ID: 16448308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations.
    Preacher KJ; Rucker DD; MacCallum RC; Nicewander WA
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Jun; 10(2):178-92. PubMed ID: 15998176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The resampling method of statistical analysis.
    Pollack S; Bruce P; Borenstein M; Lieberman J
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1994; 30(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 7831460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.