327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18808276)
1. Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making.
Ruva CL; McEvoy C
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 18808276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis.
Hoetger LA; Devine DJ; Brank EM; Drew RM; Rees R
Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):121-139. PubMed ID: 35084906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of criminal defendant's history of childhood sexual abuse and personality disorder diagnosis on juror decision making.
Butler E; Jacquin K
Personal Ment Health; 2014 Aug; 8(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 24753498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of a defendant's body weight on perceptions of guilt.
Schvey NA; Puhl RM; Levandoski KA; Brownell KD
Int J Obes (Lond); 2013 Sep; 37(9):1275-81. PubMed ID: 23295503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding pretrial publicity: predecisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors.
Hope L; Memon A; McGeorge P
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Jun; 10(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15222805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining pretrial publicity in a shadow jury paradigm: issues of slant, quantity, persistence and generalizability.
Daftary-Kapur T; Penrod SD; O'Connor M; Wallace B
Law Hum Behav; 2014 Oct; 38(5):462-77. PubMed ID: 24933173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Culture in the Courtroom: Ethnocentrism and Juror Decision-Making.
Maeder EM; Yamamoto S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137799. PubMed ID: 26353122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial.
Riedel RG
Psychol Rep; 1993 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):819-32. PubMed ID: 8302986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gruesome evidence and emotion: anger, blame, and jury decision-making.
Bright DA; Goodman-Delahunty J
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):183-202. PubMed ID: 16786406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant.
Maras K; Marshall I; Sands C
J Autism Dev Disord; 2019 Mar; 49(3):996-1010. PubMed ID: 30382444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: emotional bias and juror nullification.
Horowitz IA; Kerr NL; Park ES; Gockel C
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16786405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
Crocker CB; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
