These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18808276)

  • 41. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
    Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Battered women who kill: the impact of expert testimony and empathy induction in the courtroom.
    Plumm KM; Terrance CA
    Violence Against Women; 2009 Feb; 15(2):186-205. PubMed ID: 19126834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Estimating juror accuracy, juror ability, and the relationship between them.
    Park K
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):288-305. PubMed ID: 20658261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Juror Decision-Making in a Child Trafficking Case: The Impact of Defendant and Victim Gender, Defendant Age, and Defendant Status.
    Pica E; Hildenbrand A; Fraser L; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Sep; 38(17-18):10031-10054. PubMed ID: 37096978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Enhancing the credibility of complainants in child sexual assault trials: the effect of expert evidence and judicial directions.
    Goodman-Delahunty J; Cossins A; O'Brien K
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):769-83. PubMed ID: 21110393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity trials.
    Maeder EM; Yamamoto S; McLaughlin KJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 68():101536. PubMed ID: 32033700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
    Slane CR; Dodson CS
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments.
    Semmler C; Brewer N
    Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(4):423-36. PubMed ID: 12210977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation.
    Curley LJ; Murray J; MacLean R; Laybourn P
    Med Sci Law; 2017 Oct; 57(4):211-219. PubMed ID: 28992745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Failure of All Mothers or the Mother of All Failures? Juror Perceptions of Failure to Protect Laws.
    Stanziani M; Cox J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):NP690-NP711. PubMed ID: 29294952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Exploring the diagnostic utility of facial composites: beliefs of guilt can bias perceived similarity between composite and suspect.
    Charman SD; Gregory AH; Carlucci M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):76-90. PubMed ID: 19309218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Juror Decision Making and Euthanasia: Exploring the Role of Jury Nullification, Manner of Death, and Defendant-Decedent Relationship.
    Scott JD; Bell D; Barry B; Edlund JE
    Psychol Rep; 2023 Dec; 126(6):3052-3070. PubMed ID: 35484479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: an examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms.
    Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):43-72. PubMed ID: 11868620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fostering juror comfort: effects of an orientation videotape.
    Bradshaw GS; Ross DF; Bradshaw EE; Headrick B; Thomas WN
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):457-67. PubMed ID: 16133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Juror decision-making in a mock sexually violent predator trial: gender differences in the impact of divergent types of expert testimony.
    Guy LS; Edens JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):215-37. PubMed ID: 12645046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case.
    Meaux LT; Cox J; Kopkin MR
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):724-736. PubMed ID: 31984048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The potentially biasing effects of voir dire in juvenile waiver cases.
    Greathouse SM; Sothmann FC; Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):427-39. PubMed ID: 20936334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. "I had a confidence epiphany!": Obstacles to combating post-identification confidence inflation.
    Jones EE; Williams KD; Brewer N
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 17874286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Juror stress.
    Hafemeister TL
    Violence Vict; 1993; 8(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 8193058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. "Race salience" in juror decision-making: misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions.
    Sommers SR; Ellsworth PC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(4):599-609. PubMed ID: 19513991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.