These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18808395)

  • 1. Parameters of a dose-response model are on the boundary: what happens with BMDL?
    Kopylev L; Fox J
    Risk Anal; 2009 Jan; 29(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18808395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interval estimation of the over-dispersion parameter in the analysis of one-way layout of count data.
    Saha KK
    Stat Med; 2011 Jan; 30(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 20839369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
    Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Introduction to benchmark dose methods and U.S. EPA's benchmark dose software (BMDS) version 2.1.1.
    Davis JA; Gift JS; Zhao QJ
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2011 Jul; 254(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 21034758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonparametric Bayesian methods for benchmark dose estimation.
    Guha N; Roy A; Kopylev L; Fox J; Spassova M; White P
    Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1608-19. PubMed ID: 23339666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous confidence bands for nonlinear regression models with application to population pharmacokinetic analyses.
    Gsteiger S; Bretz F; Liu W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):708-25. PubMed ID: 21516565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toxicity value for 3-monochloropropane-1,2-diol using a benchmark dose methodology.
    Hwang M; Yoon E; Kim J; Jang DD; Yoo TM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Mar; 53(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 19133308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benchmark dose calculation for ordered categorical responses.
    Chen CC; Chen JJ
    Risk Anal; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1435-47. PubMed ID: 24444309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Profile likelihood-based confidence interval of the intraclass correlation for binary outcome data sampled from clusters.
    Saha KK
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3982-4002. PubMed ID: 22826179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of risks by predicting counterfactuals.
    Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(30):3761-81. PubMed ID: 19856279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential uncertainty reduction in model-averaged benchmark dose estimates informed by an additional dose study.
    Shao K; Small MJ
    Risk Anal; 2011 Oct; 31(10):1561-75. PubMed ID: 21388425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generalized confidence intervals for ratios of regression coefficients with applications to bioassays.
    Bebu I; Seillier-Moiseiwitsch F; Mathew T
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):1047-58. PubMed ID: 19894218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data.
    Shao K; Gift JS
    Risk Anal; 2014 Jan; 34(1):101-20. PubMed ID: 23758102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo simulation of parameter confidence intervals for non-linear regression analysis of biological data using Microsoft Excel.
    Lambert RJ; Mytilinaios I; Maitland L; Brown AM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Aug; 107(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 21764476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical inference for the within-device precision of quantitative measurements in assay validation.
    Liu JP; Lu LT; Liao CT
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):763-78. PubMed ID: 20183442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal experimental design with the sigma point method.
    Schenkendorf R; Kremling A; Mangold M
    IET Syst Biol; 2009 Jan; 3(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 19154081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient computation of confidence intervals for Bayesian model predictions based on multidimensional parameter space.
    Smith AD; Genz A; Freiberger DM; Belenky G; Van Dongen HP
    Methods Enzymol; 2009; 454():213-31. PubMed ID: 19216928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods of covariate selection: directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure.
    Weng HY; Hsueh YH; Messam LL; Hertz-Picciotto I
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 May; 169(10):1182-90. PubMed ID: 19363102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The benchmark dose approach in food risk assessment: is it applicable and worthwhile?
    Muri SD; Schlatter JR; Brüschweiler BJ
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):2906-25. PubMed ID: 19682530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.