These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Asymptotic confidence bands for generalized nonlinear regression models. Cox C; Ma G Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 7766770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A comparison of three methods for calculating confidence intervals for the benchmark dose. Moerbeek M; Piersma AH; Slob W Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 15027998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A set of SAS macros for calculating and displaying adjusted odds ratios (with confidence intervals) for continuous covariates in logistic B-spline regression models. Gregory M; Ulmer H; Pfeiffer KP; Lang S; Strasak AM Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18603325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Computation of profile likelihood-based confidence intervals for reference limits with covariates. Virtanen A; Uusipaikka E Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(7):1121-32. PubMed ID: 17674394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Interval estimation of the mean response in a log-regression model. Wu J; Wong AC; Wei W Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(12):2125-35. PubMed ID: 16220472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Role of the standard deviation in the estimation of benchmark doses with continuous data. Gaylor DW; Slikker W Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1683-7. PubMed ID: 15660621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Confidence intervals for the 50 per cent response dose. Faraggi D; Izikson P; Reiser B Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(12):1977-88. PubMed ID: 12802816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data. Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Generalized confidence intervals for ratios of regression coefficients with applications to bioassays. Bebu I; Seillier-Moiseiwitsch F; Mathew T Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):1047-58. PubMed ID: 19894218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data. Shao K; Gift JS Risk Anal; 2014 Jan; 34(1):101-20. PubMed ID: 23758102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparing the means and variances of a bivariate log-normal distribution. Bebu I; Mathew T Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2684-96. PubMed ID: 17907261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Deriving a data-based interspecies assessment factor using the NOAEL and the benchmark dose approach. Bokkers BG; Slob W Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007 Jun; 37(5):355-73. PubMed ID: 17612951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of exact and asymptotic interval estimators in logistic analysis of matched case-control studies. Vollset SE; Hirji KF; Afifi AA Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1311-25. PubMed ID: 1786321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The comparison of the confidence regions in phylogeny. Shi X; Gu H; Susko E; Field C Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Nov; 22(11):2285-96. PubMed ID: 16049192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression. Localio AR; Margolis DJ; Berlin JA J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):874-82. PubMed ID: 17689803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Planning a dose-response study with subject-specific doses. Gönen M Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2613-23. PubMed ID: 15977297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Monte Carlo simulation of parameter confidence intervals for non-linear regression analysis of biological data using Microsoft Excel. Lambert RJ; Mytilinaios I; Maitland L; Brown AM Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Aug; 107(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 21764476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]