These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18808396)

  • 1. Understanding consumer attitudes toward food technologies in Canada.
    Henson S; Annou M; Cranfield J; Ryks J
    Risk Anal; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1601-17. PubMed ID: 18808396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: lessons for the future of nutrigenomics.
    Ronteltap A; van Trijp JC; Renes RJ; Frewer LJ
    Appetite; 2007 Jul; 49(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 17382433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptions of starchy food dishes: application of the Repertory Grid Method.
    Monteleone E; Raats MM; Mela DJ
    Appetite; 1997 Jun; 28(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 9218098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consumer perception of risk associated with eating genetically engineered soybeans is less in the presence of a perceived consumer benefit.
    Brown JL; Ping Y
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 Feb; 103(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 12589328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Traceability information carriers. The technology backgrounds and consumers' perceptions of the technological solutions.
    Chrysochou P; Chryssochoidis G; Kehagia O
    Appetite; 2009 Dec; 53(3):322-31. PubMed ID: 19631704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumer perception of the use of high-pressure processing and pulsed electric field technologies in food production.
    Nielsen HB; Sonne AM; Grunert KG; Banati D; Pollák-Tóth A; Lakner Z; Olsen NV; Zontar TP; Peterman M
    Appetite; 2009 Feb; 52(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 18845196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer perceptions of food safety risk, control and responsibility.
    Redmond EC; Griffith CJ
    Appetite; 2004 Dec; 43(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15527934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging.
    Siegrist M; Stampfli N; Kastenholz H; Keller C
    Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 18406006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consumer citizenship: acting to minimise environmental health risks related to the food system.
    Kriflik L
    Appetite; 2006 May; 46(3):270-9. PubMed ID: 16730095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. European consumer response to packaging technologies for improved beef safety.
    Van Wezemael L; Ueland Ø; Verbeke W
    Meat Sci; 2011 Sep; 89(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 21543160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumer selection of food-safety information sources.
    Kornelis M; de Jonge J; Frewer L; Dagevos H
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):327-35. PubMed ID: 17511701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quest for social safety in imported foods in China: gatekeeper perceptions.
    Knight J; Gao H; Garrett T; Deans K
    Appetite; 2008 Jan; 50(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 17662504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Food safety and consumer willingness to pay for certified traceable food in China.
    Xu L; Wu L
    J Sci Food Agric; 2010 Jun; 90(8):1368-73. PubMed ID: 20474057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumer attitudes towards beef and beef technologies.
    Van Wezemael L; Verbeke W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2011; 76(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 21539204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consumer trust in food safety--a multidisciplinary approach and empirical evidence from Taiwan.
    Chen MF
    Risk Anal; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1553-69. PubMed ID: 18793284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Food biotechnology and consumer perceptions in Asia.
    Cairns G
    Food Nutr Bull; 2005 Dec; 26(4):443-4. PubMed ID: 16465994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practice-specific risk perceptions and self-reported food safety practices.
    Levy AS; Choinière CJ; Fein SB
    Risk Anal; 2008 Jun; 28(3):749-61. PubMed ID: 18643830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lay people's perception of food hazards: comparing aggregated data and individual data.
    Siegrist M; Keller C; Kiers HA
    Appetite; 2006 Nov; 47(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 16828198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acceptance of genetically modified foods: the relation between technology and evaluation.
    Tenbült P; De Vries NK; van Breukelen G; Dreezens E; Martijn C
    Appetite; 2008 Jul; 51(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 18336952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attitudes, perceptions, and trust. Insights from a consumer survey regarding genetically modified banana in Uganda.
    Kikulwe EM; Wesseler J; Falck-Zepeda J
    Appetite; 2011 Oct; 57(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 21704665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.