These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18808559)

  • 41. Selection of medical students in Taiwan.
    Lin VC; Tsai TC; Chen DF
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(10):867-8. PubMed ID: 23009256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. What are the most revealing interview questions?
    Kanter SL
    Acad Med; 2012 Apr; 87(4):387-8. PubMed ID: 22452906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An Australian approach to medical education. The Newcastle experiment.
    Leeder SR
    Med J Aust; 1984 Feb; 140(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 6694597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Types of professional careers of physicians in estimation and choices of medical students.
    Indulski J; Mazur A; Stelmaszczyk T
    Sante Publique (Bucur); 1977; 20(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 607515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Using multiple mini-interviews to assess nursing school applicants.
    McBurney S; Carty E
    Can Nurse; 2009 Jan; 105(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 19149051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Multiple mini-interviews combined with group interviews in medical student selection.
    Liao SC; Hsiue TR; Lin CH; Huang AM
    Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 48(11):1104. PubMed ID: 25307640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The making of a doctor reflections on attitudes, ability and aims in medicine.
    Fulton T
    Ulster Med J; 1980; 49(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 7394923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evolution of selection methods for admission to medical school. III. Psychological tests in the selection of medical students.
    Shanan J; Kedar H; Eliakim M; Oster ZH; Prywes M
    Isr J Med Sci; 1970; 6(1):132-44. PubMed ID: 5472884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Lower frequency of dropout and less troubles. Experiences with interview-based admissions to medical education].
    Areskog NH; Holmberg C
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Sep; 93(39):3385, 3388-90. PubMed ID: 8926812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility.
    Brownell K; Lockyer J; Collin T; Lemay JF
    Med Teach; 2007 May; 29(4):394-6. PubMed ID: 17786758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The interview process for the selection of student radiographers.
    Chapman LJ
    Radiol Technol; 1981; 53(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7339692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Selection of medical students by medical faculties. Problems and advantages for universities].
    Strauss B
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2006 Apr; 49(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 16523324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessment centres for core medical training: how do the assessors feel this compares with the traditional interview?
    Mitchison H
    Clin Med (Lond); 2009 Apr; 9(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 19435121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A cost efficiency comparison between the multiple mini-interview and traditional admissions interviews.
    Rosenfeld JM; Reiter HI; Trinh K; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 17009095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Selection of medical students: time to change.
    Faris I
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1994 Apr; 64(4):270-2. PubMed ID: 8147782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A predictive validity study of medical judgment vignettes to assess students' noncognitive attributes: a 3-year prospective longitudinal study.
    Donnon T; Oddone-Paolucci E; Violato C
    Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):e148-55. PubMed ID: 19241216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The use of a structured interview guide in veterinary college admissions.
    Molgaard LK; Lewis RE
    J Vet Med Educ; 2008; 35(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 19066365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Generation Next.
    Kiser K
    Minn Med; 2016; 99(3):12-6. PubMed ID: 27323516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Admission interview reports: a content analysis of interviewer comments.
    Elam CL; Johnson MM; Wiese HJ; Studts JL; Rosenbaum M
    Acad Med; 1994 Oct; 69(10 Suppl):S63-5. PubMed ID: 7916831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The personal interview: assessing the potential for personality similarity to bias the selection of orthopaedic residents.
    Quintero AJ; Segal LS; King TS; Black KP
    Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10):1364-72. PubMed ID: 19881423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.