These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18809179)
1. Primary rotational stability of cylindrical and conical revision hip stems as a function of femoral bone defects: an in vitro comparison. Jakubowitz E; Bitsch RG; Heisel C; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Thomsen MN J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):3078-84. PubMed ID: 18809179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. Decking R; Puhl W; Simon U; Claes LE Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jun; 21(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 16457913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses. Kirk KL; Potter BK; Lehman RA; Xenos JS Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Oct; 36(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 18033566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The influence of reduced bone density on primary stability of cementless femoral stems. A biomechanical in vitro study]. Götze C; Steens W; Vieth V; Marquardt B; Böttner F Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 17607628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary stability and strain distribution of cementless hip stems as a function of implant design. Bieger R; Ignatius A; Decking R; Claes L; Reichel H; Dürselen L Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Feb; 27(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 21889243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fixation pattern of conical and cylindrical modular revision hip stems in different size bone defects. Kinkel S; Nadorf J; Thomsen MN; Heisel C; Jahnke A; Kretzer JP; Jakubowitz E Int Orthop; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1819-25. PubMed ID: 26156721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stem revision: special implant versus primary device. Cherubino P; Surace MF; Zatti G Chir Organi Mov; 2003; 88(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 15146945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary stability of an anatomical cementless hip stem: a statistical analysis. Viceconti M; Brusi G; Pancanti A; Cristofolini L J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1169-79. PubMed ID: 15927191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subject specific finite element analysis of implant stability for a cementless femoral stem. Pettersen SH; Wik TS; Skallerud B Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Jul; 24(6):480-7. PubMed ID: 19368993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessments of different kinds of stems by experiments and FEM analysis: appropriate stress distribution on a hip prosthesis. Sakai R; Itoman M; Mabuchi K Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Oct; 21(8):826-33. PubMed ID: 16701927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotically-milled bone cavities: a comparison with hand-broaching in different types of cementless hip stems. Thomsen MN; Breusch SJ; Aldinger PR; Görtz W; Lahmer A; Honl M; Birke A; Nägerl H Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Aug; 73(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 12358108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can the rasp be used to predict intra-operatively the primary stability that can be achieved by press-fitting the stem in cementless hip arthroplasty? Varini E; Cristofolini L; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 May; 23(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 18068878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary rotational stability of various megaprostheses in a biomechanical sawbone model with proximal femoral defects extending to the isthmus. Kinkel S; Nadorf J; Graage JD; Jakubowitz E; Kretzer JP PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129149. PubMed ID: 26030460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary stability of custom and anatomical uncemented femoral stems: a method for three-dimensional in vitro measurement of implant stability. Østbyhaug PO; Klaksvik J; Romundstad P; Aamodt A Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 May; 25(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 20129726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The compression-rotation stem: an experimental study on the primary stability of a new revision hip stem. Kraenzlein J; Mazoochian F; Fottner A; Birkenmaier C; von Schulze Pellengahr C; Jansson V Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jan; 223(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 19239066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stair climbing is more critical than walking in pre-clinical assessment of primary stability in cementless THA in vitro. Kassi JP; Heller MO; Stoeckle U; Perka C; Duda GN J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1143-54. PubMed ID: 15797595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Device to measure intra-operatively the primary stability of cementless hip stems. Cristofolini L; Varini E; Pelgreffi I; Cappello A; Toni A Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jun; 28(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16144768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distal stem features improve the torsional resistance of long-stem cemented revision hip stems: an in vitro biomechanical study. Holsgrove TP; Petheram TG; Miles AW; Timperley AJ Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 May; 227(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 23637260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The primary stability between manual and robot assisted implantation of hip prostheses: A biomechanical study on synthetic femurs]. Decking J; Gerber A; Kränzlein J; Meurer A; Böhm B; Plitz W Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15250003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty faced with femoral bone defects: an experimental analysis. Kinkel S; Thomsen MN; Nadorf J; Heisel C; Tanner MC; Jakubowitz E Int Orthop; 2014 Jun; 38(6):1147-53. PubMed ID: 24384941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]