337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18809782)
1. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
Keating AP; Knox J; Bibb R; Zhurov AI
J Orthod; 2008 Sep; 35(3):191-201; discussion 175. PubMed ID: 18809782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.
Hazeveld A; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of standardization on the precision (reproducibility) of dental cast analysis with virtual 3-dimensional models.
Hayashi K; Chung O; Park S; Lee SP; Sachdeva RC; Mizoguchi I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 25726405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of linear measurements of resin, plaster, digital and printed study-models.
Saleh WK; Ariffin E; Sherriff M; Bister D
J Orthod; 2015; 42(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 26216658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
Burns A; Dowling AH; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
Ender A; Mehl A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the augmented reproducibility in measurements on 3D orthodontic digital dental models and the definition of feature points.
Jacquet W; Nyssen E; Ibel G; Vannet BV
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 23785935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements.
Sousa MV; Vasconcelos EC; Janson G; Garib D; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22858338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility.
Dalstra M; Melsen B
J Orthod; 2009 Mar; 36(1):36-41; discussion 14. PubMed ID: 19286874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies.
Dietrich CA; Ender A; Baumgartner S; Mehl A
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 28459285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis.
Akyalcin S; Dyer DJ; English JD; Sar C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner.
Persson A; Andersson M; Oden A; Sandborgh-Englund G
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 16543016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of linear measurements and analyses taken from plaster models and three-dimensional images.
Porto BG; Porto TS; Silva MB; Grehs RA; Pinto Ados S; Bhandi SH; Tonetto MR; Bandéca MC; dos Santos-Pinto LA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 25825090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner.
Olszewski R; Szyper-Szczurowska J; Opach M; Bednarczyk P; Zapala J; Szczepanik S
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Dec; 28(12):1647-1656. PubMed ID: 31778603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: an experimental model matching approach.
Komiyama A; Pettersson A; Hultin M; Näsström K; Klinge B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20868453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
