150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18810018)
1. Computer-assisted Cobb angle measurement on posteroanterior radiographs.
Zhang J; Lou E; Le LH; Hill D; Raso J; Wang Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():151-6. PubMed ID: 18810018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a computer-aided method for measuring the Cobb angle on chest X-rays.
Pan Y; Chen Q; Chen T; Wang H; Zhu X; Fang Z; Lu Y
Eur Spine J; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3035-3043. PubMed ID: 31446493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic Cobb measurement of scoliosis based on fuzzy Hough Transform with vertebral shape prior.
Zhang J; Lou E; Le LH; Hill DL; Raso JV; Wang Y
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Oct; 22(5):463-72. PubMed ID: 18516643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.
Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Allen S; Parent E; Khorasani M; Hill DL; Lou E; Raso JV
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 17340228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The validity and reliability of "Spinal Mouse" assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves.
Livanelioglu A; Kaya F; Nabiyev V; Demirkiran G; Fırat T
Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):476-82. PubMed ID: 25900295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of Cobb angles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Hill D; Allen S; Parent E; Khorasani M; Lou E; Raso J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 123():207-12. PubMed ID: 17108428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Cobb angle measurements in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Prestigiacomo FG; Hulsbosch MHHM; Bruls VEJ; Nieuwenhuis JJ
Spine Deform; 2022 Jan; 10(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 34383285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Review of the Methods on Cobb Angle Measurements for Spinal Curvature.
Jin C; Wang S; Yang G; Li E; Liang Z
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35590951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.
Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs.
Zhang J; Lou E; Hill DL; Raso JV; Wang Y; Le LH; Shi X
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2010 Feb; 48(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 20012376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between Cobb angle, spinous process angle (SPA) and apical vertebrae rotation (AVR) on posteroanterior radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Morrison DG; Chan A; Hill D; Parent EC; Lou EH
Eur Spine J; 2015 Feb; 24(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 25412836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of a novel Cobb protractor for measuring the Cobb angle of radiograph in scoliosis.
Wu G; Wang H; Ding R; Xue XH; Wu ZH; Qiu GX
Chin Med Sci J; 2015 Mar; 30(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 25837355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Centroid method: reliable method to determine the coronal curvature of scoliosis: a case control study comparing with the Cobb method.
Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Ryu JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):E855-61. PubMed ID: 21289563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.
Lechner R; Putzer D; Dammerer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):957-962. PubMed ID: 27921155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis.
Mehta SS; Modi HN; Srinivasalu S; Chen T; Suh SW; Yang JH; Song HR
J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 20104157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
